Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LGLVX vs RGACX
LGLVX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts LGLVX vs RGACX
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders R6
Price$60.60
Change+$0.25 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.12B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$86.01
Change+$0.47 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets341.24B
LGLVX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LGLVX vs. RGACX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGLVX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. LGLVX (8.12B). RGACX pays higher dividends than LGLVX: RGACX (0.07) vs LGLVX (0.00). LGLVX was incepted earlier than RGACX: LGLVX (10 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than LGLVX (0.59). LGLVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). LGLVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: LGLVX (0) vs RGACX (250). LGLVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.47 vs. RGACX (14.27). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 42.40 vs. LGLVX (31.68).
| LGLVX | RGACX | LGLVX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.94 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.94 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.339 | 19.475 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.12B | 341B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.47 | 14.27 | 249% |
| Returns for 3 years | 120.98 | 74.11 | 163% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.68 | 42.40 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 162.16 | 101.13 | 160% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement