Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LGRCX vs RGACX
LGRCX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts LGRCX vs RGACX
Loomis Sayles Growth C
Price$23.62
Change-$0.16 (-0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.75B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.69
Change-$0.58 (-0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.73B
LGRCX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LGRCX vs. RGACX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGRCX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 330B vs. LGRCX (17.7B). RGACX pays higher dividends than LGRCX: RGACX (0.07) vs LGRCX (0.00). LGRCX was incepted earlier than RGACX: LGRCX (22 years) vs RGACX (24 years). LGRCX (1.67) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. LGRCX (10.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGRCX: RGACX (250) vs LGRCX (2500). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.60 vs. LGRCX (4.01). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 30.90 vs. LGRCX (21.44).
| LGRCX | RGACX | LGRCX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 0.94 | 177% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 0.94 | 178% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.504 | 14.863 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.7B | 330B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.01 | 6.60 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.87 | 60.28 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.44 | 30.90 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 131.57 | 84.84 | 155% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement