Ad is loading...
LGRCX vs RGEBX
LGRCX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts LGRCX vs RGEBX
Loomis Sayles Growth C
Price$18.82
Change+$0.45 (+2.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.56B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$64.94
Change+$1.40 (+2.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets261.66B
LGRCX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LGRCX vs. RGEBX commentary
Apr 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGRCX is a StrongBuy and RGEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 262B vs. LGRCX (13.6B). LGRCX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . LGRCX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: LGRCX (22 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). LGRCX (1.67) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.09). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGRCX: RGEBX (250) vs LGRCX (2500). LGRCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.13 vs. RGEBX (-4.08). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 34.26 vs. LGRCX (22.39).
| LGRCX | RGEBX | LGRCX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 1.09 | 152% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.09 | 153% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.835 | -11.058 | 134% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.6B | 262B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.13 | -4.08 | 28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.70 | 8.01 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.39 | 34.26 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.50 | 39.50 | 219% |