Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LGRNX vs RGACX
LGRNX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts LGRNX vs RGACX
Loomis Sayles Growth N
Price$33.70
Change-$0.11 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.28B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.59
Change-$0.14 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.91B
LGRNX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LGRNX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGRNX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. LGRNX (18.3B). RGACX pays higher dividends than LGRNX: RGACX (0.07) vs LGRNX (0.00). LGRNX was incepted earlier than RGACX: LGRNX (13 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than LGRNX (0.57). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. LGRNX (10.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGRNX: RGACX (250) vs LGRNX (1000000). LGRNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.75 vs. RGACX (17.28). LGRNX return over 5 years is better than : 53.46 vs. RGACX (46.76).
| LGRNX | RGACX | LGRNX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 0.94 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 0.94 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.621 | 17.502 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.3B | 336B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.75 | 17.28 | 126% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.94 | 58.54 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.46 | 46.76 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 218.15 | 98.36 | 222% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement