Ad is loading...
LGRNX vs RGEBX
LGRNX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts LGRNX vs RGEBX
Loomis Sayles Growth N
Price$25.83
Change+$0.33 (+1.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.39B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$64.37
Change+$1.01 (+1.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets260.89B
LGRNX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LGRNX vs. RGEBX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGRNX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 261B vs. LGRNX (13.4B). LGRNX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . LGRNX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: LGRNX (12 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.09) is less costly to investors than LGRNX (0.57). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGRNX: RGEBX (250) vs LGRNX (1000000). LGRNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.04 vs. RGEBX (-5.95). LGRNX return over 5 years is better than : 48.86 vs. RGEBX (43.55).
| LGRNX | RGEBX | LGRNX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 1.09 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 1.09 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.026 | -9.896 | 142% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.4B | 261B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.04 | -5.95 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.79 | 5.16 | 229% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.86 | 43.55 | 112% |
| Returns for 10 years | 136.33 | 44.23 | 308% |