LGYV
Price
$2.00
Change
-$0.05 (-2.44%)
Updated
Apr 12 closing price
SLAMF
Price
$11.41
Change
+$0.06 (+0.53%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
Ad is loading...

LGYV vs SLAMF

Header iconLGYV vs SLAMF Comparison
Open Charts LGYV vs SLAMFBanner chart's image
Legacy Ventures International
Price$2.00
Change-$0.05 (-2.44%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
Slam
Price$11.41
Change+$0.06 (+0.53%)
Volume$300.42K
CapitalizationN/A
LGYV vs SLAMF Comparison Chart
Loading...
SLAMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LGYV vs. SLAMF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGYV is a Hold and SLAMF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (LGYV: $2.00 vs. SLAMF: $11.41)
Brand notoriety: LGYV and SLAMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LGYV: 100% vs. SLAMF: 1454%
Market capitalization -- LGYV: $130.82M vs. SLAMF: $438.8M
LGYV [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $130.82M. SLAMF’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $438.8M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $2.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LGYV’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSLAMF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LGYV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SLAMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SLAMF is a better buy in the long-term than LGYV.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SLAMF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SLAMF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 0 bearish.

Price Growth

LGYV (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SLAMF (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +2.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

LGYV is expected to report earnings on Feb 01, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-0.82% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLAMF($439M) has a higher market cap than LGYV($131M). SLAMF has higher P/E ratio than LGYV: SLAMF (65.00) vs LGYV (7.94). SLAMF YTD gains are higher at: 5.161 vs. LGYV (-21.875). LGYV has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 23.6K vs. SLAMF (-3.36M). SLAMF has more cash in the bank: 3.34K vs. LGYV (2.04K). LGYV has less debt than SLAMF: LGYV (185K) vs SLAMF (10.2M). LGYV (0) and SLAMF (0) have equivalent revenues.
LGYVSLAMFLGYV / SLAMF
Capitalization131M439M30%
EBITDA23.6K-3.36M-1%
Gain YTD-21.8755.161-424%
P/E Ratio7.9465.0012%
Revenue00-
Total Cash2.04K3.34K61%
Total Debt185K10.2M2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LGYV: Fundamental Ratings
LGYV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
30
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
71
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
91
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LGYVSLAMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
10%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
24%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
7%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
21%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
7%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
14%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
7%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SLAMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FRSX0.920.29
+44.90%
Foresight Autonomous Holdings Ltd
SNAP11.220.04
+0.36%
Snap
SR64.46-3.84
-5.62%
Spire
GOSS0.80-0.07
-7.84%
Gossamer Bio
IRS15.00-1.58
-9.53%
IRSA Inversiones Y Representaciones S.A

LGYV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LGYV and SLAMF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LGYV and SLAMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LGYV
1D Price
Change %
LGYV100%
N/A
SLAMF - LGYV
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BRKH - LGYV
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.94%
NGRC - LGYV
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SBHGF - LGYV
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.77%
MEIL - LGYV
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.17%
More

SLAMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLAMF has been loosely correlated with KACL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SLAMF jumps, then KACL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLAMF
1D Price
Change %
SLAMF100%
N/A
KACL - SLAMF
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.08%
NVAC - SLAMF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
RCFAF - SLAMF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PPYA - SLAMF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BLEU - SLAMF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More