LGYV
Price
$2.50
Change
+$0.50 (+25.00%)
Updated
Feb 5 closing price
Capitalization
130.82M
SLAMF
Price
$11.50
Change
-$0.20 (-1.71%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
438.8M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LGYV vs SLAMF

Header iconLGYV vs SLAMF Comparison
Open Charts LGYV vs SLAMFBanner chart's image
Legacy Ventures International
Price$2.50
Change+$0.50 (+25.00%)
Volume$219
Capitalization130.82M
Slam
Price$11.50
Change-$0.20 (-1.71%)
Volume$1.31K
Capitalization438.8M
LGYV vs SLAMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SLAMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LGYV vs. SLAMF commentary
Jul 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGYV is a Hold and SLAMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2025
Stock price -- (LGYV: $2.50 vs. SLAMF: $11.50)
Brand notoriety: LGYV and SLAMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LGYV: 100% vs. SLAMF: 8%
Market capitalization -- LGYV: $130.82M vs. SLAMF: $438.8M
LGYV [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $130.82M. SLAMF’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $438.8M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LGYV’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSLAMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LGYV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SLAMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SLAMF is a better buy in the long-term than LGYV.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SLAMF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SLAMF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.

Price Growth

LGYV (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SLAMF (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was -2.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was +90.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

LGYV is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.

SLAMF is expected to report earnings on Apr 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.88% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLAMF($439M) has a higher market cap than LGYV($131M). SLAMF has higher P/E ratio than LGYV: SLAMF (65.00) vs LGYV (7.94). LGYV YTD gains are higher at: 25.000 vs. SLAMF (1.322). LGYV has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 23.6K vs. SLAMF (-3.36M). SLAMF has more cash in the bank: 3.34K vs. LGYV (2.04K). LGYV has less debt than SLAMF: LGYV (185K) vs SLAMF (10.2M). LGYV (0) and SLAMF (0) have equivalent revenues.
LGYVSLAMFLGYV / SLAMF
Capitalization131M439M30%
EBITDA23.6K-3.36M-1%
Gain YTD25.0001.3221,892%
P/E Ratio7.9465.0012%
Revenue00-
Total Cash2.04K3.34K61%
Total Debt185K10.2M2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LGYV: Fundamental Ratings
LGYV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
35
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
88
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
51
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
90
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
32

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LGYVSLAMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
3%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
N/A
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
N/A
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SLAMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYFIX106.13N/A
N/A
Rydex Financial Services Inv
CSCZX51.02N/A
N/A
Columbia Small Cap Value I Inst
TPVIX19.63N/A
N/A
Timothy Plan Small Cap Value I
TRLHX24.02N/A
N/A
Nuveen Large Cap Value I
VNSNX23.78N/A
N/A
Natixis Vaughan Nelson Select N

LGYV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LGYV and SLAMF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LGYV and SLAMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LGYV
1D Price
Change %
LGYV100%
N/A
SLAMF - LGYV
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NGRC - LGYV
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SBHGF - LGYV
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.35%
MTLK - LGYV
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PCMC - LGYV
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More