LGYV
Price
$2.50
Change
+$0.50 (+25.00%)
Updated
Feb 5 closing price
Capitalization
125.79M
SLAMF
Price
$11.57
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 10 closing price
Capitalization
166.83M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LGYV vs SLAMF

Header iconLGYV vs SLAMF Comparison
Open Charts LGYV vs SLAMFBanner chart's image
Legacy Ventures International
Price$2.50
Change+$0.50 (+25.00%)
Volume$219
Capitalization125.79M
Slam
Price$11.57
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$113
Capitalization166.83M
LGYV vs SLAMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LGYV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLAMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LGYV vs. SLAMF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGYV is a Hold and SLAMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (LGYV: $2.50 vs. SLAMF: $11.57)
Brand notoriety: LGYV and SLAMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LGYV: 100% vs. SLAMF: 32%
Market capitalization -- LGYV: $125.79M vs. SLAMF: $166.83M
LGYV [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $125.79M. SLAMF’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $166.83M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $173.25M.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LGYV’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSLAMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LGYV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SLAMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SLAMF is a better buy in the long-term than LGYV.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LGYV’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLAMF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LGYV’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • SLAMF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both LGYV and SLAMF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

LGYV (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SLAMF (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.53%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.60% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLAMF($167M) has a higher market cap than LGYV($126M). LGYV YTD gains are higher at: 25.000 vs. SLAMF (1.938). LGYV has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -48.76K vs. SLAMF (-1.97M). LGYV has more cash in the bank: 842 vs. SLAMF (66). LGYV (0) and SLAMF (0) have equivalent revenues.
LGYVSLAMFLGYV / SLAMF
Capitalization126M167M75%
EBITDA-48.76K-1.97M2%
Gain YTD25.0001.9381,290%
P/E RatioN/A144.63-
Revenue00-
Total Cash842661,276%
Total DebtN/A14.5M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LGYV: Fundamental Ratings
LGYV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
35
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
90
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
54
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
85
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
43

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LGYVSLAMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
5%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
17%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
6%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
15%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
6%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
6%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LGYV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLAMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CBAOF1.94N/A
N/A
CIBanco SA CTF Bursatiles Fiduciarios Inmobiliario
SPXXF13.52N/A
N/A
Sparebanken Nord Norge
WWNTF0.69N/A
N/A
Want Want China Holdings Ltd
ZFSVF715.00-6.25
-0.87%
Zurich Insurance Group Ltd
NGPHF0.10N/A
-1.23%
Northern Graphite Corp.

LGYV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LGYV and SLAMF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LGYV and SLAMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LGYV
1D Price
Change %
LGYV100%
N/A
SLAMF - LGYV
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NGRC - LGYV
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTLK - LGYV
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PCMC - LGYV
0%
Poorly correlated
-55.53%
PLTYF - LGYV
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SLAMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLAMF has been loosely correlated with MNTN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SLAMF jumps, then MNTN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLAMF
1D Price
Change %
SLAMF100%
N/A
MNTN - SLAMF
36%
Loosely correlated
-3.38%
LGYV - SLAMF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PEGR - SLAMF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BBOE - SLAMF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NHIC - SLAMF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More