LH
Price
$270.38
Change
-$0.87 (-0.32%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
22.47B
67 days until earnings call
NOTV
Price
$1.89
Change
+$0.05 (+2.72%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
64.93M
127 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LH vs NOTV

Header iconLH vs NOTV Comparison
Open Charts LH vs NOTVBanner chart's image
Laboratory
Price$270.38
Change-$0.87 (-0.32%)
Volume$370.01K
Capitalization22.47B
Inotiv
Price$1.89
Change+$0.05 (+2.72%)
Volume$296.48K
Capitalization64.93M
LH vs NOTV Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NOTV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LH vs. NOTV commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LH is a Hold and NOTV is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (LH: $270.38 vs. NOTV: $1.89)
Brand notoriety: LH and NOTV are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical Specialties industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LH: 54% vs. NOTV: 59%
Market capitalization -- LH: $22.47B vs. NOTV: $64.93M
LH [@Medical Specialties] is valued at $22.47B. NOTV’s [@Medical Specialties] market capitalization is $64.93M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical Specialties] industry ranges from $3.82T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical Specialties] industry is $10.48B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LH’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNOTV’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NOTV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LH is a better buy in the long-term than NOTV.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LH’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NOTV’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NOTV’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LH is a better buy in the short-term than NOTV.

Price Growth

LH (@Medical Specialties) experienced а +1.70% price change this week, while NOTV (@Medical Specialties) price change was +3.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was +3.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.62%.

Reported Earning Dates

LH is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

NOTV is expected to report earnings on Dec 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical Specialties (+3.75% weekly)

Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LH($22.5B) has a higher market cap than NOTV($64.9M). LH YTD gains are higher at: 18.588 vs. NOTV (-54.348). LH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.87B vs. NOTV (5.65M). LH has more cash in the bank: 647M vs. NOTV (19.3M). NOTV has less debt than LH: NOTV (452M) vs LH (6.55B). LH has higher revenues than NOTV: LH (13.5B) vs NOTV (480M).
LHNOTVLH / NOTV
Capitalization22.5B64.9M34,669%
EBITDA1.87B5.65M33,080%
Gain YTD18.588-54.348-34%
P/E Ratio29.81N/A-
Revenue13.5B480M2,813%
Total Cash647M19.3M3,352%
Total Debt6.55B452M1,448%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LH vs NOTV: Fundamental Ratings
LH
NOTV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7276
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
37100
SMR RATING
1..100
7196
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1963
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8576
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LH's Valuation (11) in the Servicestothe Health Industry industry is significantly better than the same rating for NOTV (79). This means that LH’s stock grew significantly faster than NOTV’s over the last 12 months.

LH's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the Servicestothe Health Industry industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NOTV (100). This means that LH’s stock grew somewhat faster than NOTV’s over the last 12 months.

LH's SMR Rating (71) in the Servicestothe Health Industry industry is in the same range as NOTV (96). This means that LH’s stock grew similarly to NOTV’s over the last 12 months.

LH's Price Growth Rating (19) in the Servicestothe Health Industry industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NOTV (63). This means that LH’s stock grew somewhat faster than NOTV’s over the last 12 months.

NOTV's P/E Growth Rating (76) in the Servicestothe Health Industry industry is in the same range as LH (85). This means that NOTV’s stock grew similarly to LH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LHNOTV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NOTV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OBYCF16.00N/A
N/A
Obayashi Corp.
MAWHY11.62N/A
N/A
Man Wah Holdings, Ltd.
PCPJ0.46N/A
N/A
PaperClip, Inc.
CFWFF2.48-0.06
-2.36%
Calfrac Well Services Ltd.
STCB0.03N/A
-10.77%
Starco Brands, Inc.

LH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LH has been loosely correlated with DGX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LH jumps, then DGX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LH
1D Price
Change %
LH100%
-0.32%
DGX - LH
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.75%
RVTY - LH
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.49%
A - LH
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.28%
MTD - LH
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.10%
CRL - LH
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.56%
More

NOTV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NOTV has been loosely correlated with CRL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NOTV jumps, then CRL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NOTV
1D Price
Change %
NOTV100%
+2.72%
CRL - NOTV
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.56%
LH - NOTV
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.32%
A - NOTV
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.28%
ICUI - NOTV
40%
Loosely correlated
+8.09%
ILMN - NOTV
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.02%
More