Ad is loading...
LICCX vs VFWPX
LICCX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts LICCX vs VFWPX
Lord Abbett International Equity C
Price$15.64
Change+$0.06 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets353.02M
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$127.21
Change+$0.36 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets59.24B
LICCX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LICCX vs. VFWPX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LICCX is a StrongBuy and VFWPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 59.2B vs. LICCX (353M). VFWPX pays higher dividends than LICCX: VFWPX (3.04) vs LICCX (0.49). LICCX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: LICCX (21 years) vs VFWPX (14 years). LICCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). LICCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). LICCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: LICCX (1500) vs VFWPX (100000000). VFWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.20 vs. LICCX (3.43). VFWPX return over 5 years is better than : 60.12 vs. LICCX (53.42).
| LICCX | VFWPX | LICCX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.03 | 5,700% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.03 | 5,700% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.448 | 6.053 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 100000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353M | 59.2B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 3.04 | 16% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.43 | 5.20 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.41 | 7.31 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.42 | 60.12 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.87 | 32.15 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers