Ad is loading...
LICCX vs VFWPX
LICCX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts LICCX vs VFWPX
Lord Abbett International Equity C
Price$14.77
Change+$0.08 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.4M
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$121.03
Change+$0.57 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets55.84B
LICCX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LICCX vs. VFWPX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LICCX is a Buy and VFWPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 55.8B vs. LICCX (328M). VFWPX pays higher dividends than LICCX: VFWPX (3.36) vs LICCX (0.42). LICCX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: LICCX (21 years) vs VFWPX (14 years). LICCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 106.00 vs. VFWPX (4.00). LICCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: LICCX (1500) vs VFWPX (100000000). LICCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.23 vs. VFWPX (7.39). VFWPX return over 5 years is better than : 9.94 vs. LICCX (7.54).
| LICCX | VFWPX | LICCX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.862 | 1.077 | 173% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 100000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328M | 55.8B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.42 | 3.36 | 13% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.23 | 7.39 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.45 | -2.59 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.54 | 9.94 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.27 | 32.88 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...