Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LICCX vs VFWPX
LICCX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts LICCX vs VFWPX
Lord Abbett International Equity C
Price$18.36
Change+$0.14 (+0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets486.89M
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$151.29
Change+$0.71 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.16B
LICCX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LICCX vs. VFWPX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LICCX is a Hold and VFWPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 74.2B vs. LICCX (487M). VFWPX pays higher dividends than LICCX: VFWPX (2.74) vs LICCX (0.42). LICCX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: LICCX (22 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). LICCX (1.72) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). LICCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). LICCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: LICCX (1500) vs VFWPX (100000000). VFWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.95 vs. LICCX (14.10). VFWPX return over 5 years is better than : 43.71 vs. LICCX (32.09).
| LICCX | VFWPX | LICCX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.03 | 5,733% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.03 | 5,733% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.655 | 26.271 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 100000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 487M | 74.2B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.42 | 2.74 | 15% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.10 | 16.95 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.56 | 64.31 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.09 | 43.71 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.75 | 69.74 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement