Ad is loading...
LICCX vs VFWPX
LICCX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts LICCX vs VFWPX
Lord Abbett International Equity C
Price$15.78
Change-$0.12 (-0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets351.68M
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$127.78
Change-$0.71 (-0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets57.94B
LICCX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LICCX vs. VFWPX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LICCX is a Buy and VFWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 57.9B vs. LICCX (352M). VFWPX pays higher dividends than LICCX: VFWPX (3.36) vs LICCX (0.42). LICCX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: LICCX (21 years) vs VFWPX (14 years). LICCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 106.00 vs. VFWPX (4.00). LICCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: LICCX (1500) vs VFWPX (100000000). LICCX (8.19) and VFWPX (7.82) have marching annual gain over last year. VFWPX return over 5 years is better than : 20.26 vs. LICCX (19.26).
| LICCX | VFWPX | LICCX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.828 | 6.715 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 100000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 352M | 57.9B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.42 | 3.36 | 13% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.19 | 7.82 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.36 | 6.70 | 155% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.26 | 20.26 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.51 | 32.72 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...