LICT
Price
$11000.00
Change
-$300.00 (-2.65%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
173.05M
LILAB
Price
$9.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
Capitalization
1.64B
Interact to see
Advertisement

LICT vs LILAB

Header iconLICT vs LILAB Comparison
Open Charts LICT vs LILABBanner chart's image
LICT
Price$11000.00
Change-$300.00 (-2.65%)
Volume$2
Capitalization173.05M
Liberty Latin America
Price$9.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$200
Capitalization1.64B
LICT vs LILAB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LICT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LILAB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LICT vs. LILAB commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LICT is a Hold and LILAB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (LICT: $11000.00 vs. LILAB: $9.00)
Brand notoriety: LICT and LILAB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LICT: 21% vs. LILAB: 58%
Market capitalization -- LICT: $173.05M vs. LILAB: $1.64B
LICT [@Major Telecommunications] is valued at $173.05M. LILAB’s [@Major Telecommunications] market capitalization is $1.64B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Telecommunications] industry ranges from $267.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Telecommunications] industry is $19.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LICT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLILAB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LICT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LILAB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both LICT and LILAB are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LICT’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LILAB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LICT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LILAB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LILAB is a better buy in the short-term than LICT.

Price Growth

LICT (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а -3.08% price change this week, while LILAB (@Major Telecommunications) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was -0.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +41.60%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Telecommunications (-0.36% weekly)

Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LILAB($1.65B) has a higher market cap than LICT($173M). LILAB YTD gains are higher at: 62.162 vs. LICT (-22.807).
LICTLILABLICT / LILAB
Capitalization173M1.65B11%
EBITDAN/A318M-
Gain YTD-22.80762.162-37%
P/E Ratio19.26N/A-
RevenueN/A4.41B-
Total CashN/A514M-
Total DebtN/A8.25B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LICT vs LILAB: Fundamental Ratings
LICT
LILAB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6345
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
499
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8040
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1435
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LILAB's Valuation (78) in the null industry is in the same range as LICT (79). This means that LILAB’s stock grew similarly to LICT’s over the last 12 months.

LILAB's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as LICT (100). This means that LILAB’s stock grew similarly to LICT’s over the last 12 months.

LICT's SMR Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LILAB (99). This means that LICT’s stock grew significantly faster than LILAB’s over the last 12 months.

LILAB's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LICT (80). This means that LILAB’s stock grew somewhat faster than LICT’s over the last 12 months.

LICT's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is in the same range as LILAB (35). This means that LICT’s stock grew similarly to LILAB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LICTLILAB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
21%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
17%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
28%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
16%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
44%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LICT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LILAB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RGNCX38.96N/A
N/A
Victory Global Energy Transition C
RYELX488.37N/A
N/A
Rydex Electronics A
CFIGX14.63N/A
N/A
Columbia Flexible Capital Income C
FIKNX20.23N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Z
EMILX19.82N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Emerging Markets Equity I

LICT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LICT and CTOWY have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LICT and CTOWY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LICT
1D Price
Change %
LICT100%
N/A
CTOWY - LICT
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PTTWF - LICT
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KNIT - LICT
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTNOF - LICT
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LILAB - LICT
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

LILAB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LILAB has been loosely correlated with BCOMF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LILAB jumps, then BCOMF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LILAB
1D Price
Change %
LILAB100%
N/A
BCOMF - LILAB
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MTNOF - LILAB
33%
Loosely correlated
N/A
LICT - LILAB
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MYTAY - LILAB
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.00%
KDDIY - LILAB
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.46%
More