Advertisement
LICT vs PTTWF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LICT is a Hold and PTTWF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LICT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePTTWF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- LICT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- PTTWF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LICT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- LICT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
LICT (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а -0.76% price change this week, while PTTWF (@Major Telecommunications) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +1.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +41.74%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Major Telecommunications (+1.92% weekly)Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.
| LICT | PTTWF | LICT / PTTWF | |
| Capitalization | 183M | 3.1B | 6% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 4.08B | - |
| Gain YTD | -19.737 | 0.000 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 19.26 | 13.94 | 138% |
| Revenue | N/A | 12.8B | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 648M | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 7.44B | - |
LICT | PTTWF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 5 | 38 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 80 Overvalued | 15 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 82 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 4 | 77 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 81 | 70 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 14 | 19 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PTTWF's Valuation (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LICT (80). This means that PTTWF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LICT’s over the last 12 months.
PTTWF's Profit vs Risk Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as LICT (100). This means that PTTWF’s stock grew similarly to LICT’s over the last 12 months.
LICT's SMR Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PTTWF (77). This means that LICT’s stock grew significantly faster than PTTWF’s over the last 12 months.
PTTWF's Price Growth Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as LICT (81). This means that PTTWF’s stock grew similarly to LICT’s over the last 12 months.
LICT's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is in the same range as PTTWF (19). This means that LICT’s stock grew similarly to PTTWF’s over the last 12 months.
| LICT | PTTWF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 35% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 39% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 43% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 24% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 15% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 44% | 2 days ago 13% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 47% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 40% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | N/A |
Advertisement
LICT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LICT and CTOWY have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LICT and CTOWY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LICT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LICT | 100% | N/A | ||
| CTOWY - LICT | 31% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PTTWF - LICT | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| KNIT - LICT | 11% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MTNOF - LICT | 9% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| LILAB - LICT | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
PTTWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PTTWF and LICT have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PTTWF and LICT's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PTTWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PTTWF | 100% | N/A | ||
| LICT - PTTWF | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TLSNF - PTTWF | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| IHS - PTTWF | 2% Poorly correlated | +1.15% | ||
| CUCSF - PTTWF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| LLEIF - PTTWF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||