Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LIDCX vs TRIGX
LIDCX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts LIDCX vs TRIGX
Lord Abbett International Value C
Price$9.18
Change-$0.07 (-0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets446.97M
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$20.48
Change-$0.16 (-0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.82B
LIDCX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LIDCX vs. TRIGX commentary
May 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIDCX is a Buy and TRIGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 14.8B vs. LIDCX (447M). TRIGX pays higher dividends than LIDCX: TRIGX (2.21) vs LIDCX (2.09). LIDCX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: LIDCX (17 years) vs TRIGX (26 years). LIDCX (1.74) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.87). LIDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). LIDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIGX: LIDCX (1500) vs TRIGX (2500). TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.61 vs. LIDCX (14.89). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 111.96 vs. LIDCX (80.02).
| LIDCX | TRIGX | LIDCX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.87 | 200% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.87 | 200% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.518 | 21.483 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 2500 | 60% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 447M | 14.8B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.09 | 2.21 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.89 | 18.61 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.10 | 55.59 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 80.02 | 111.96 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.07 | 61.83 | 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement