Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LIDCX vs TRIGX
LIDCX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts LIDCX vs TRIGX
Lord Abbett International Value C
Price$9.50
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets462.39M
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$22.21
Change+$0.04 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.31B
LIDCX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LIDCX vs. TRIGX commentary
Sep 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIDCX is a Hold and TRIGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16.3B vs. LIDCX (462M). LIDCX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: LIDCX (2.13) vs TRIGX (1.96). LIDCX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: LIDCX (17 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). LIDCX (1.74) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.87). LIDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). LIDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIGX: LIDCX (1500) vs TRIGX (2500). TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.54 vs. LIDCX (17.42). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 98.98 vs. LIDCX (61.41).
| LIDCX | TRIGX | LIDCX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.87 | 200% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.87 | 200% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.494 | 30.489 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 2500 | 60% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 462M | 16.3B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.13 | 1.96 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.42 | 24.54 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.13 | 86.88 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.41 | 98.98 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.16 | 100.43 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement