Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LIDFX vs TRIGX
LIDFX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts LIDFX vs TRIGX
Lord Abbett International Value F
Price$9.65
Change-$0.09 (-0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets462.39M
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$22.17
Change-$0.17 (-0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.31B
LIDFX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LIDFX vs. TRIGX commentary
Sep 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIDFX is a Buy and TRIGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16.3B vs. LIDFX (462M). LIDFX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: LIDFX (2.90) vs TRIGX (1.96). LIDFX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: LIDFX (17 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). TRIGX (0.87) and LIDFX (0.84) have similar cost to investors . LIDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). LIDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIGX: LIDFX (0) vs TRIGX (2500). TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.07 vs. LIDFX (17.86). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 100.67 vs. LIDFX (68.89).
| LIDFX | TRIGX | LIDFX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.87 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.87 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.474 | 31.489 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 462M | 16.3B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.90 | 1.96 | 148% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.86 | 23.07 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.55 | 88.31 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 68.89 | 100.67 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.66 | 101.97 | 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers