Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LIDFX vs TRIGX
LIDFX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts LIDFX vs TRIGX
Lord Abbett International Value F
Price$9.63
Change+$0.10 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets453.86M
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$21.72
Change+$0.13 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.81B
LIDFX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LIDFX vs. TRIGX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIDFX is a Buy and TRIGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 15.8B vs. LIDFX (454M). LIDFX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: LIDFX (3.03) vs TRIGX (2.05). LIDFX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: LIDFX (17 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). TRIGX (0.87) and LIDFX (0.84) have similar cost to investors . LIDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). LIDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIGX: LIDFX (0) vs TRIGX (2500). TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.90 vs. LIDFX (25.15). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 95.67 vs. LIDFX (68.38).
| LIDFX | TRIGX | LIDFX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.87 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.87 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.769 | 27.075 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 454M | 15.8B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.03 | 2.05 | 148% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.15 | 29.90 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.12 | 70.33 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 68.38 | 95.67 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.53 | 75.80 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement