Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LIDFX vs TRIGX
LIDFX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts LIDFX vs TRIGX
Lord Abbett International Value F
Price$10.16
Change-$0.03 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets477.55M
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$23.49
Change-$0.11 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.73B
LIDFX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LIDFX vs. TRIGX commentary
Dec 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIDFX is a StrongBuy and TRIGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16.7B vs. LIDFX (478M). LIDFX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: LIDFX (2.89) vs TRIGX (1.85). LIDFX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: LIDFX (17 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). TRIGX (0.87) and LIDFX (0.84) have similar cost to investors . LIDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). LIDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIGX: LIDFX (0) vs TRIGX (2500). TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.45 vs. LIDFX (28.66). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 84.98 vs. LIDFX (56.98).
| LIDFX | TRIGX | LIDFX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.87 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.87 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.995 | 38.258 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 478M | 16.7B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.89 | 1.85 | 156% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.66 | 35.45 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.07 | 75.37 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.98 | 84.98 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.07 | 107.23 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers