Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LIDFX vs TRIGX
LIDFX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts LIDFX vs TRIGX
Lord Abbett International Value F
Price$9.86
Change-$0.08 (-0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets469.45M
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$22.92
Change-$0.21 (-0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.55B
LIDFX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LIDFX vs. TRIGX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIDFX is a Buy and TRIGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16.5B vs. LIDFX (469M). LIDFX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: LIDFX (2.97) vs TRIGX (1.91). LIDFX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: LIDFX (17 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). TRIGX (0.87) and LIDFX (0.84) have similar cost to investors . LIDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). LIDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIGX: LIDFX (0) vs TRIGX (2500). TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.11 vs. LIDFX (23.24). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 106.76 vs. LIDFX (72.51).
| LIDFX | TRIGX | LIDFX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.87 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.87 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.756 | 36.139 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 469M | 16.5B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.97 | 1.91 | 156% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.24 | 28.11 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 85.44 | 106.36 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 72.51 | 106.76 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.62 | 101.40 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers