LIF
Price
$93.44
Change
+$4.96 (+5.61%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
7.25B
73 days until earnings call
QXO
Price
$22.05
Change
+$1.41 (+6.83%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
14.85B
72 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LIF vs QXO

Header iconLIF vs QXO Comparison
Open Charts LIF vs QXOBanner chart's image
Life360 Inc Common Stock
Price$93.44
Change+$4.96 (+5.61%)
Volume$631.63K
Capitalization7.25B
QXO
Price$22.05
Change+$1.41 (+6.83%)
Volume$10.07M
Capitalization14.85B
LIF vs QXO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QXO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LIF vs. QXO commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIF is a StrongBuy and QXO is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (LIF: $93.44 vs. QXO: $22.05)
Brand notoriety: LIF and QXO are both not notable
LIF represents the Packaged Software, while QXO is part of the Electronics Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LIF: 87% vs. QXO: 146%
Market capitalization -- LIF: $7.25B vs. QXO: $14.85B
LIF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $7.25B. QXO’s [@Electronics Distributors] market capitalization is $14.85B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $309.84B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronics Distributors] industry ranges from $55.08B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.97B. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronics Distributors] industry is $8.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LIF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQXO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • QXO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both LIF and QXO are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LIF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QXO’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LIF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • QXO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QXO is a better buy in the short-term than LIF.

Price Growth

LIF (@Packaged Software) experienced а +3.31% price change this week, while QXO (@Electronics Distributors) price change was +9.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.00%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics Distributors industry was +3.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.05%.

Reported Earning Dates

LIF is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2025.

QXO is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.74% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

@Electronics Distributors (+3.87% weekly)

Electronics distributors are companies that are involved in distribution of one or more of the following: electronic components, computer products/ peripherals and software products & services. Several electronics distributors are also becoming the point of contact for technical/pre- & post-sale support in many cases, in an attempt to bolster their position in the market. Tariffs and/or cross-border trade barriers are some of the potential threats to the electronics supply chain, but that could also potentially lead to re-directing to markets where tariffs/restrictions are lower depending on demand. The industry is also vulnerable in the event of economic slowdowns. Arrow Electronics, Inc., SYNNEX Corporation and Versum Materials, Inc. are some of the major electronics distributors in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QXO($14.9B) has a higher market cap than LIF($7.25B). LIF has higher P/E ratio than QXO: LIF (245.89) vs QXO (2.34). LIF YTD gains are higher at: 126.411 vs. QXO (38.679). LIF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 16.3M vs. QXO (-38.71M). QXO has more cash in the bank: 2.28B vs. LIF (433M). LIF has less debt than QXO: LIF (309M) vs QXO (4.12B). QXO has higher revenues than LIF: QXO (1.95B) vs LIF (427M).
LIFQXOLIF / QXO
Capitalization7.25B14.9B49%
EBITDA16.3M-38.71M-42%
Gain YTD126.41138.679327%
P/E Ratio245.892.3410,505%
Revenue427M1.95B22%
Total Cash433M2.28B19%
Total Debt309M4.12B8%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QXO: Fundamental Ratings
QXO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
92
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LIFQXO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QXO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WTAI26.360.42
+1.62%
WisdomTree Artfcl Intllgnc & Innvtn ETF
ADVE36.990.23
+0.63%
Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF
TDSB22.950.07
+0.29%
ETC Cabana Target Beta ETF
BENJ51.20N/A
+0.01%
Horizon Landmark ETF
PWB119.59-0.48
-0.40%
Invesco Large Cap Growth ETF

LIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIF has been loosely correlated with PAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LIF jumps, then PAR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LIF
1D Price
Change %
LIF100%
+5.61%
PAR - LIF
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.37%
PLUS - LIF
37%
Loosely correlated
-1.21%
AEYE - LIF
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.18%
PCOR - LIF
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.39%
INTA - LIF
34%
Loosely correlated
-1.19%
More

QXO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QXO has been loosely correlated with CYN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QXO jumps, then CYN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QXO
1D Price
Change %
QXO100%
+6.83%
CYN - QXO
40%
Loosely correlated
+10.78%
MLGO - QXO
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.00%
LIF - QXO
31%
Poorly correlated
+5.61%
PLUS - QXO
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.21%
WCC - QXO
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.37%
More