Advertisement
LIF vs QXO
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIF is a Hold and QXO is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LIF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQXO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- LIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- QXO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LIF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QXO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LIF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- QXO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
LIF (@Packaged Software) experienced а +14.39% price change this week, while QXO (@Packaged Software) price change was +9.97% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.38%.
Reported Earning Dates
QXO is expected to report earnings on Aug 14, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (+0.13% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| LIF | QXO | LIF / QXO | |
| Capitalization | 6.9B | 14.1B | 49% |
| EBITDA | 11.3M | 69M | 16% |
| Gain YTD | 115.508 | 32.453 | 356% |
| P/E Ratio | 234.05 | 21.67 | 1,080% |
| Revenue | 397M | 55.9M | 710% |
| Total Cash | 169M | 5.08B | 3% |
| Total Debt | 263K | 500K | 53% |
QXO | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 81 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 75 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 94 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 78 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| LIF | QXO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | N/A |
Advertisement
LIF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIF has been loosely correlated with PAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LIF jumps, then PAR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LIF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIF | 100% | +6.45% | ||
| PAR - LIF | 39% Loosely correlated | +4.40% | ||
| AEYE - LIF | 35% Loosely correlated | +4.45% | ||
| PCOR - LIF | 34% Loosely correlated | +4.37% | ||
| PLUS - LIF | 33% Loosely correlated | +2.66% | ||
| BSY - LIF | 33% Poorly correlated | -0.53% | ||
More | ||||
QXO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QXO has been loosely correlated with CYN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QXO jumps, then CYN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QXO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QXO | 100% | +5.51% | ||
| CYN - QXO | 40% Loosely correlated | +5.56% | ||
| MLGO - QXO | 36% Loosely correlated | +4.53% | ||
| LIF - QXO | 31% Poorly correlated | +6.45% | ||
| S - QXO | 28% Poorly correlated | +5.46% | ||
| PLUS - QXO | 28% Poorly correlated | +2.66% | ||
More | ||||