LIF
Price
$104.51
Change
+$0.74 (+0.71%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
8.1B
50 days until earnings call
QXO
Price
$18.79
Change
-$0.14 (-0.74%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
12.66B
50 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LIF vs QXO

Header iconLIF vs QXO Comparison
Open Charts LIF vs QXOBanner chart's image
Life360 Inc Common Stock
Price$104.51
Change+$0.74 (+0.71%)
Volume$837.2K
Capitalization8.1B
QXO
Price$18.79
Change-$0.14 (-0.74%)
Volume$5.65M
Capitalization12.66B
LIF vs QXO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QXO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LIF vs. QXO commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIF is a StrongBuy and QXO is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (LIF: $104.51 vs. QXO: $18.79)
Brand notoriety: LIF and QXO are both not notable
LIF represents the Packaged Software, while QXO is part of the Electronics Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LIF: 90% vs. QXO: 77%
Market capitalization -- LIF: $8.1B vs. QXO: $12.66B
LIF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $8.1B. QXO’s [@Electronics Distributors] market capitalization is $12.66B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $305.79B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronics Distributors] industry ranges from $55.89B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.92B. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronics Distributors] industry is $7.98B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LIF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQXO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • QXO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LIF is a better buy in the long-term than QXO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LIF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QXO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LIF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • QXO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both LIF and QXO are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

LIF (@Packaged Software) experienced а +1.54% price change this week, while QXO (@Electronics Distributors) price change was -8.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +110.36%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics Distributors industry was -0.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.51%.

Reported Earning Dates

LIF is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2025.

QXO is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-0.14% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

@Electronics Distributors (-0.12% weekly)

Electronics distributors are companies that are involved in distribution of one or more of the following: electronic components, computer products/ peripherals and software products & services. Several electronics distributors are also becoming the point of contact for technical/pre- & post-sale support in many cases, in an attempt to bolster their position in the market. Tariffs and/or cross-border trade barriers are some of the potential threats to the electronics supply chain, but that could also potentially lead to re-directing to markets where tariffs/restrictions are lower depending on demand. The industry is also vulnerable in the event of economic slowdowns. Arrow Electronics, Inc., SYNNEX Corporation and Versum Materials, Inc. are some of the major electronics distributors in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QXO($12.7B) has a higher market cap than LIF($8.11B). LIF has higher P/E ratio than QXO: LIF (275.03) vs QXO (1.99). LIF YTD gains are higher at: 153.235 vs. QXO (18.176). LIF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 16.3M vs. QXO (-38.71M). QXO has more cash in the bank: 2.28B vs. LIF (433M). LIF has less debt than QXO: LIF (309M) vs QXO (4.12B). QXO has higher revenues than LIF: QXO (1.95B) vs LIF (427M).
LIFQXOLIF / QXO
Capitalization8.11B12.7B64%
EBITDA16.3M-38.71M-42%
Gain YTD153.23518.176843%
P/E Ratio275.031.9913,788%
Revenue427M1.95B22%
Total Cash433M2.28B19%
Total Debt309M4.12B8%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QXO: Fundamental Ratings
QXO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
66
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
98
SMR RATING
1..100
92
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
54
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
39

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LIFQXO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QXO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GCISX17.860.16
+0.90%
Goldman Sachs Intl Eq Insghts S
FCTDX19.320.12
+0.62%
Strategic Advisers Fidelity US TtlStk
BRWAX28.740.16
+0.56%
MFS Blended Research Growth Eq A
OTPIX51.490.22
+0.43%
ProFunds NASDAQ-100 Inv
FSEAX64.46-0.87
-1.33%
Fidelity Emerging Asia

LIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIF has been loosely correlated with PAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LIF jumps, then PAR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LIF
1D Price
Change %
LIF100%
+0.71%
PAR - LIF
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.05%
INTA - LIF
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.17%
PLUS - LIF
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.13%
ESTC - LIF
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.98%
BRZE - LIF
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.98%
More

QXO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QXO has been loosely correlated with CYN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QXO jumps, then CYN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QXO
1D Price
Change %
QXO100%
-0.74%
CYN - QXO
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.73%
MLGO - QXO
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.48%
LIF - QXO
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.71%
WCC - QXO
31%
Poorly correlated
+2.53%
PLUS - QXO
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.13%
More