LIFFF
Price
$1.84
Change
+$0.06 (+3.37%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
MP
Price
$16.73
Change
-$1.64 (-8.93%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
63 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

LIFFF vs MP

Header iconLIFFF vs MP Comparison
Open Charts LIFFF vs MPBanner chart's image
Li-Ft Power
Price$1.84
Change+$0.06 (+3.37%)
Volume$13.66K
CapitalizationN/A
MP Materials
Price$16.73
Change-$1.64 (-8.93%)
Volume$3.14M
CapitalizationN/A
LIFFF vs MP Comparison Chart
Loading...
LIFFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LIFFF vs. MP commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIFFF is a Hold and MP is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (LIFFF: $1.84 vs. MP: $16.73)
Brand notoriety: LIFFF and MP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LIFFF: 66% vs. MP: 117%
Market capitalization -- LIFFF: $279.45M vs. MP: $2.37B
LIFFF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $279.45M. MP’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $2.37B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LIFFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LIFFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MP is a better buy in the long-term than LIFFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LIFFF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LIFFF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MP is a better buy in the short-term than LIFFF.

Price Growth

LIFFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -5.15% price change this week, while MP (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -13.98% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -3.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.34%.

Reported Earning Dates

MP is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-3.05% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MP($2.37B) has a higher market cap than LIFFF($279M). MP YTD gains are higher at: -15.718 vs. LIFFF (-60.336). MP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 94M vs. LIFFF (-1.55M). MP has more cash in the bank: 998M vs. LIFFF (35.3M). MP has higher revenues than LIFFF: MP (253M) vs LIFFF (0).
LIFFFMPLIFFF / MP
Capitalization279M2.37B12%
EBITDA-1.55M94M-2%
Gain YTD-60.336-15.718384%
P/E RatioN/A107.71-
Revenue0253M-
Total Cash35.3M998M4%
Total DebtN/A689M-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LIFFFMP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LIFFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MEICX47.31-1.09
-2.25%
MFS Value C
OCRDX18.36-0.49
-2.60%
Invesco Rising Dividends C
TLVCX15.37-0.46
-2.91%
Timothy Plan Large/Mid Cap Value C
IIRMX11.45-0.42
-3.54%
Voya Russell Mid Cap Index Port I
LFGVX37.01-1.66
-4.29%
Lord Abbett Focused Growth R6

LIFFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LIFFF and CVVUF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LIFFF and CVVUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LIFFF
1D Price
Change %
LIFFF100%
+3.17%
CVVUF - LIFFF
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.08%
SGML - LIFFF
23%
Poorly correlated
-5.88%
NILIF - LIFFF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.56%
MP - LIFFF
21%
Poorly correlated
-8.93%
DRCMF - LIFFF
21%
Poorly correlated
-5.21%
More

MP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MP has been loosely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MP jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MP
1D Price
Change %
MP100%
-8.93%
FCX - MP
51%
Loosely correlated
-4.70%
HBM - MP
48%
Loosely correlated
-6.22%
LAC - MP
48%
Loosely correlated
-6.39%
MTRN - MP
48%
Loosely correlated
-5.86%
SCCO - MP
47%
Loosely correlated
-3.91%
More