It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LIFFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LIFFF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
LIFFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -5.15% price change this week, while MP (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -13.98% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -3.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.34%.
MP is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.
The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.
LIFFF | MP | LIFFF / MP | |
Capitalization | 279M | 2.37B | 12% |
EBITDA | -1.55M | 94M | -2% |
Gain YTD | -60.336 | -15.718 | 384% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 107.71 | - |
Revenue | 0 | 253M | - |
Total Cash | 35.3M | 998M | 4% |
Total Debt | N/A | 689M | - |
LIFFF | MP | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago73% | 1 day ago81% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago58% | 1 day ago82% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago90% | 1 day ago83% |
MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago75% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago85% | 1 day ago78% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago81% | 1 day ago77% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 21 days ago82% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago89% | 1 day ago82% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago76% | 1 day ago76% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that LIFFF and CVVUF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LIFFF and CVVUF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LIFFF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LIFFF | 100% | +3.17% | ||
CVVUF - LIFFF | 24% Poorly correlated | -2.08% | ||
SGML - LIFFF | 23% Poorly correlated | -5.88% | ||
NILIF - LIFFF | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.56% | ||
MP - LIFFF | 21% Poorly correlated | -8.93% | ||
DRCMF - LIFFF | 21% Poorly correlated | -5.21% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MP has been loosely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MP jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.