LIFFF
Price
$1.71
Change
+$0.06 (+3.64%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
279.45M
MP
Price
$62.08
Change
+$0.52 (+0.84%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
2.37B
12 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LIFFF vs MP

Header iconLIFFF vs MP Comparison
Open Charts LIFFF vs MPBanner chart's image
Li-Ft Power
Price$1.71
Change+$0.06 (+3.64%)
Volume$1.98K
Capitalization279.45M
MP Materials
Price$62.08
Change+$0.52 (+0.84%)
Volume$10.03M
Capitalization2.37B
LIFFF vs MP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LIFFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LIFFF vs. MP commentary
Jul 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIFFF is a Hold and MP is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2025
Stock price -- (LIFFF: $1.71 vs. MP: $62.08)
Brand notoriety: LIFFF and MP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LIFFF: 10% vs. MP: 60%
Market capitalization -- LIFFF: $279.45M vs. MP: $2.37B
LIFFF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $279.45M. MP’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $2.37B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LIFFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LIFFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MP is a better buy in the long-term than LIFFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LIFFF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LIFFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MP is a better buy in the short-term than LIFFF.

Price Growth

LIFFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -0.58% price change this week, while MP (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -1.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.83%.

Reported Earning Dates

MP is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MP($2.37B) has a higher market cap than LIFFF($279M). MP YTD gains are higher at: 297.949 vs. LIFFF (-6.044). MP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 94M vs. LIFFF (-1.55M). MP has more cash in the bank: 998M vs. LIFFF (35.3M). MP has higher revenues than LIFFF: MP (253M) vs LIFFF (0).
LIFFFMPLIFFF / MP
Capitalization279M2.37B12%
EBITDA-1.55M94M-2%
Gain YTD-6.044297.949-2%
P/E RatioN/A107.71-
Revenue0253M-
Total Cash35.3M998M4%
Total DebtN/A689M-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LIFFFMP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LIFFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BGIFX15.540.03
+0.21%
Baillie Gifford International Alpha 3
FSTCX61.96N/A
N/A
Fidelity Select Telecommunications Port
ODVCX39.32N/A
N/A
Invesco Developing Markets C
SDYAX18.34N/A
N/A
SEI Dynamic Asset Allocation F (SIMT)
ACEAX9.65N/A
N/A
AB All China Equity A

LIFFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LIFFF and CVVUF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LIFFF and CVVUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LIFFF
1D Price
Change %
LIFFF100%
+3.63%
CVVUF - LIFFF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.11%
SGML - LIFFF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.39%
NILIF - LIFFF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.40%
MP - LIFFF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.84%
CRECF - LIFFF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.47%
More