Ad is loading...
LIFLX vs RMFCX
LIFLX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LIFLX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value I
Price$13.54
Change-$0.41 (-2.94%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$54.22
Change-$1.42 (-2.55%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
LIFLX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LIFLX vs. RMFCX commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIFLX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 98.7B vs. LIFLX (32.2M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LIFLX: RMFCX (1.69) vs LIFLX (0.00). LIFLX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LIFLX (5 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LIFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RMFCX (25.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LIFLX: RMFCX (250) vs LIFLX (1000000). LIFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.60 vs. RMFCX (12.63). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 40.39 vs. LIFLX (-8.15).
| LIFLX | RMFCX | LIFLX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.419 | 11.423 | 196% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32.2M | 98.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.69 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.60 | 12.63 | 187% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.15 | 14.16 | -36% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.15 | 40.39 | -20% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 61.84 | - |