Ad is loading...
LIFLX vs RMFCX
LIFLX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LIFLX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value I
Price$12.91
Change+$0.08 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.28M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$52.60
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets96.51B
LIFLX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LIFLX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIFLX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 96.5B vs. LIFLX (32.3M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LIFLX: RMFCX (1.34) vs LIFLX (0.88). LIFLX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LIFLX (6 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LIFLX (1.67) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LIFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LIFLX: RMFCX (250) vs LIFLX (1000000). LIFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.96 vs. RMFCX (3.42). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 48.78 vs. LIFLX (24.08).
| LIFLX | RMFCX | LIFLX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.91 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 0.91 | 184% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.051 | -3.342 | 151% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32.3M | 96.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 1.34 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.96 | 3.42 | 145% |
| Returns for 3 years | -12.76 | 5.55 | -230% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.08 | 48.78 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 54.35 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers