Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LIFLX vs RWEBX
LIFLX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts LIFLX vs RWEBX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value I
Price$15.94
Change+$0.02 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.96M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$67.04
Change+$0.13 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets208.74B
LIFLX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LIFLX vs. RWEBX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIFLX is a Hold and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. LIFLX (75M). RWEBX (0.76) and LIFLX (0.75) have matching dividends . LIFLX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: LIFLX (6 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). LIFLX (1.39) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). LIFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LIFLX: RWEBX (250) vs LIFLX (1000000). LIFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.82 vs. RWEBX (5.78). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 47.84 vs. LIFLX (18.04).
| LIFLX | RWEBX | LIFLX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.06 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.06 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.545 | 10.264 | 161% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 75M | 209B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.76 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.82 | 5.78 | 274% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.60 | 43.12 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.04 | 47.84 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 76.62 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement