Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LIFLX vs RWEBX
LIFLX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts LIFLX vs RWEBX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value I
Price$16.18
Change+$0.06 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets88.77M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$68.30
Change+$0.42 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets211.91B
LIFLX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LIFLX vs. RWEBX commentary
Dec 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIFLX is a StrongBuy and RWEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 212B vs. LIFLX (88.8M). RWEBX pays higher dividends than LIFLX: RWEBX (0.74) vs LIFLX (0.00). LIFLX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: LIFLX (6 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). LIFLX (1.39) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). LIFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LIFLX: RWEBX (250) vs LIFLX (1000000). LIFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.52 vs. RWEBX (5.46). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 42.93 vs. LIFLX (12.05).
| LIFLX | RWEBX | LIFLX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.06 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.06 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.448 | 12.336 | 150% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 88.8M | 212B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.74 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.52 | 5.46 | 229% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.09 | 31.15 | 186% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.05 | 42.93 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 72.22 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement