Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LIFLX vs RWMHX
LIFLX vs RWMHX Comparison
Open Charts LIFLX vs RWMHX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value I
Price$16.18
Change+$0.06 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets88.77M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5E
Price$68.68
Change+$0.42 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets211.91B
LIFLX vs RWMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LIFLX vs. RWMHX commentary
Dec 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIFLX is a StrongBuy and RWMHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMHX has more cash in the bank: 212B vs. LIFLX (88.8M). RWMHX pays higher dividends than LIFLX: RWMHX (1.30) vs LIFLX (0.00). LIFLX was incepted earlier than RWMHX: LIFLX (6 years) vs RWMHX (10 years). LIFLX (1.39) is less costly to investors than RWMHX (0.41). LIFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RWMHX (29.00). RWMHX has a lower initial minimum investment than LIFLX: RWMHX (250) vs LIFLX (1000000). LIFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.52 vs. RWMHX (6.18). RWMHX return over 5 years is better than : 46.64 vs. LIFLX (12.05).
| LIFLX | RWMHX | LIFLX / RWMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.41 | 173% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.41 | 339% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.448 | 13.020 | 142% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 88.8M | 212B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.30 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.52 | 6.18 | 203% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.09 | 33.62 | 173% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.05 | 46.64 | 26% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 77.34 | - |