LIFZF
Price
$20.49
Change
-$0.08 (-0.39%)
Updated
Apr 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.21B
MT
Price
$24.73
Change
-$2.21 (-8.20%)
Updated
Apr 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
20.83B
27 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

LIFZF vs MT

Header iconLIFZF vs MT Comparison
Open Charts LIFZF vs MTBanner chart's image
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty
Price$20.49
Change-$0.08 (-0.39%)
Volume$19.32K
Capitalization1.21B
ArcelorMittal
Price$24.73
Change-$2.21 (-8.20%)
Volume$19.68K
Capitalization20.83B
LIFZF vs MT Comparison Chart
Loading...
LIFZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LIFZF vs. MT commentary
Apr 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIFZF is a Hold and MT is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 05, 2025
Stock price -- (LIFZF: $20.49 vs. MT: $26.95)
Brand notoriety: LIFZF: Not notable vs. MT: Notable
Both companies represent the Steel industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LIFZF: 50% vs. MT: 102%
Market capitalization -- LIFZF: $1.29B vs. MT: $20.83B
LIFZF [@Steel] is valued at $1.29B. MT’s [@Steel] market capitalization is $20.83B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Steel] industry ranges from $25.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Steel] industry is $4.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LIFZF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LIFZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LIFZF is a better buy in the long-term than MT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LIFZF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LIFZF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • MT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both LIFZF and MT are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

LIFZF (@Steel) experienced а -2.98% price change this week, while MT (@Steel) price change was -9.32% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Steel industry was -4.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

MT is expected to report earnings on May 02, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Steel (-4.19% weekly)

The steel industry includes manufacturers of steel and steel-related products. Companies use iron ore and scrap steel to produce steel. The industry also includes companies involved in mining and marketing of steel products. Along with serving some of the domestic markets, U.S. steel output has, over the years, been used by international economies as well. Competition from imported steel has also increased over time. The industry could be susceptible to business cycles, since the element is an important input in industrial production. Some of the globally-renowned steel behemoths include Nucor Corporation, Vale, and ArcelorMittal SA.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MT($20.8B) has a higher market cap than LIFZF($1.21B). MT has higher P/E ratio than LIFZF: MT (14.64) vs LIFZF (9.83). MT YTD gains are higher at: 16.515 vs. LIFZF (1.885). MT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.06B vs. LIFZF (163M). MT has more cash in the bank: 6.4B vs. LIFZF (42.3M). MT has higher revenues than LIFZF: MT (62.4B) vs LIFZF (208M).
LIFZFMTLIFZF / MT
Capitalization1.21B20.8B6%
EBITDA163M6.06B3%
Gain YTD1.88516.51511%
P/E Ratio9.8314.6467%
Revenue208M62.4B0%
Total Cash42.3M6.4B1%
Total DebtN/A11.6B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LIFZF vs MT: Fundamental Ratings
LIFZF
MT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8677
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6134
SMR RATING
1..100
3798
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5743
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3882
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LIFZF's Valuation (3) in the null industry is in the same range as MT (13) in the Steel industry. This means that LIFZF’s stock grew similarly to MT’s over the last 12 months.

MT's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the Steel industry is in the same range as LIFZF (61) in the null industry. This means that MT’s stock grew similarly to LIFZF’s over the last 12 months.

LIFZF's SMR Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MT (98) in the Steel industry. This means that LIFZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MT’s over the last 12 months.

MT's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Steel industry is in the same range as LIFZF (57) in the null industry. This means that MT’s stock grew similarly to LIFZF’s over the last 12 months.

LIFZF's P/E Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MT (82) in the Steel industry. This means that LIFZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LIFZFMT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LIFZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BCH27.210.45
+1.68%
Banco de ChileAmerican
LIXT1.18-0.03
-2.87%
Lixte Biotechnology Holdings
GH42.02-1.47
-3.38%
Guardant Health
OM11.07-1.08
-8.89%
Outset Medical Inc
ASTL5.11-0.52
-9.24%
Algoma Steel Group

LIFZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIFZF has been loosely correlated with MT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LIFZF jumps, then MT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LIFZF
1D Price
Change %
LIFZF100%
-0.39%
MT - LIFZF
35%
Loosely correlated
-7.29%
SID - LIFZF
33%
Poorly correlated
-1.25%
TX - LIFZF
31%
Poorly correlated
-5.08%
CLF - LIFZF
31%
Poorly correlated
-16.84%
MSB - LIFZF
29%
Poorly correlated
-4.10%
More

MT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MT has been loosely correlated with CLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MT jumps, then CLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MT
1D Price
Change %
MT100%
-7.29%
CLF - MT
61%
Loosely correlated
-16.84%
GGB - MT
54%
Loosely correlated
-2.44%
SID - MT
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.25%
ATI - MT
51%
Loosely correlated
-9.41%
CMC - MT
50%
Loosely correlated
-11.52%
More