LILIF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
SBWFF
Price
$0.11
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
88.84M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LILIF vs SBWFF

Header iconLILIF vs SBWFF Comparison
Open Charts LILIF vs SBWFFBanner chart's image
Argentina Lithium & Energy
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$53.39K
CapitalizationN/A
CORNISH METALS
Price$0.11
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$34.4K
Capitalization88.84M
LILIF vs SBWFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LILIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBWFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LILIF vs. SBWFF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LILIF is a Hold and SBWFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (LILIF: $0.04 vs. SBWFF: $0.11)
Brand notoriety: LILIF and SBWFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LILIF: 84% vs. SBWFF: 164%
Market capitalization -- LILIF: $0 vs. SBWFF: $88.84M
LILIF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $0. SBWFF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $88.84M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LILIF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSBWFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LILIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SBWFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SBWFF is a better buy in the long-term than LILIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LILIF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBWFF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LILIF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SBWFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both LILIF and SBWFF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

LILIF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +1.39% price change this week, while SBWFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +3.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.02%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.12% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBWFF YTD gains are higher at: 6.336 vs. LILIF (-45.250).
LILIFSBWFFLILIF / SBWFF
CapitalizationN/A88.8M-
EBITDAN/A-1.5M-
Gain YTD-45.2506.336-714%
P/E RatioN/A12.63-
RevenueN/A0-
Total CashN/A51.9M-
Total DebtN/A0-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LILIF vs SBWFF: Fundamental Ratings
LILIF
SBWFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
503
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10086
SMR RATING
1..100
9690
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8946
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10021
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a29

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LILIF's Valuation (23) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SBWFF (76). This means that LILIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SBWFF’s over the last 12 months.

SBWFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as LILIF (100). This means that SBWFF’s stock grew similarly to LILIF’s over the last 12 months.

SBWFF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as LILIF (96). This means that SBWFF’s stock grew similarly to LILIF’s over the last 12 months.

SBWFF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LILIF (89). This means that SBWFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LILIF’s over the last 12 months.

SBWFF's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LILIF (100). This means that SBWFF’s stock grew significantly faster than LILIF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LILIFSBWFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LILIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBWFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GCMG11.620.12
+1.04%
GCM Grosvenor
STKH1.71N/A
+0.01%
Steakholder Foods Ltd
DKL43.74-0.02
-0.05%
Delek Logistics Partners LP
TTC74.54-0.06
-0.08%
Toro Company (The)
SRZN8.36-0.38
-4.35%
Surrozen

LILIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LILIF and SBWFF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LILIF and SBWFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LILIF
1D Price
Change %
LILIF100%
+9.50%
SBWFF - LILIF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LTSRF - LILIF
20%
Poorly correlated
+4.08%
LLKKF - LILIF
20%
Poorly correlated
-16.29%
MALRY - LILIF
20%
Poorly correlated
+7.44%
LAC - LILIF
14%
Poorly correlated
-1.85%
More

SBWFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SBWFF and SLI have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SBWFF and SLI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBWFF
1D Price
Change %
SBWFF100%
N/A
SLI - SBWFF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.90%
LILIF - SBWFF
20%
Poorly correlated
+9.50%
SHVLF - SBWFF
11%
Poorly correlated
-1.04%
SHERF - SBWFF
10%
Poorly correlated
-5.82%
RTPPF - SBWFF
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.66%
More