LIMAF
Price
$49.28
Change
+$1.70 (+3.57%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
3.55B
MNTHF
Price
$2.00
Change
+$0.05 (+2.56%)
Updated
Jan 24 closing price
Capitalization
3.7B
Interact to see
Advertisement

LIMAF vs MNTHF

Header iconLIMAF vs MNTHF Comparison
Open Charts LIMAF vs MNTHFBanner chart's image
Linamar
Price$49.28
Change+$1.70 (+3.57%)
Volume$4.27K
Capitalization3.55B
Minth Group
Price$2.00
Change+$0.05 (+2.56%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization3.7B
LIMAF vs MNTHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LIMAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LIMAF vs. MNTHF commentary
Jul 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIMAF is a Buy and MNTHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 03, 2025
Stock price -- (LIMAF: $49.28 vs. MNTHF: $2.00)
Brand notoriety: LIMAF and MNTHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LIMAF: 50% vs. MNTHF: 100%
Market capitalization -- LIMAF: $3.55B vs. MNTHF: $3.7B
LIMAF [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $3.55B. MNTHF’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $3.7B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LIMAF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMNTHF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LIMAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MNTHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LIMAF is a better buy in the long-term than MNTHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LIMAF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • LIMAF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

LIMAF (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +6.64% price change this week, while MNTHF (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +3.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.45%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+3.54% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MNTHF($3.7B) and LIMAF($3.55B) have the same market capitalization . MNTHF has higher P/E ratio than LIMAF: MNTHF (14.62) vs LIMAF (10.99). LIMAF YTD gains are higher at: 24.768 vs. MNTHF (2.828). MNTHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.82B vs. LIMAF (1.09B). MNTHF has more cash in the bank: 4.64B vs. LIMAF (891M). LIMAF has less debt than MNTHF: LIMAF (1.37B) vs MNTHF (7.44B). MNTHF has higher revenues than LIMAF: MNTHF (14.5B) vs LIMAF (8.43B).
LIMAFMNTHFLIMAF / MNTHF
Capitalization3.55B3.7B96%
EBITDA1.09B1.82B60%
Gain YTD24.7682.828876%
P/E Ratio10.9914.6275%
Revenue8.43B14.5B58%
Total Cash891M4.64B19%
Total Debt1.37B7.44B18%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LIMAF vs MNTHF: Fundamental Ratings
LIMAF
MNTHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1542
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
64100
SMR RATING
1..100
8476
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4457
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
968
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5030

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MNTHF's Valuation (12) in the null industry is in the same range as LIMAF (28). This means that MNTHF’s stock grew similarly to LIMAF’s over the last 12 months.

LIMAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MNTHF (100). This means that LIMAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MNTHF’s over the last 12 months.

MNTHF's SMR Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as LIMAF (84). This means that MNTHF’s stock grew similarly to LIMAF’s over the last 12 months.

LIMAF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as MNTHF (57). This means that LIMAF’s stock grew similarly to MNTHF’s over the last 12 months.

LIMAF's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MNTHF (68). This means that LIMAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MNTHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LIMAFMNTHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
10%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
11%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LIMAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JLCAX21.050.13
+0.62%
JPMorgan US Large Cap Core Plus A
PGRCX54.59N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth C
TVRVX25.02N/A
N/A
Third Avenue Real Estate Value Investor
TCEPX43.22N/A
N/A
Nuveen Equity Index Premier
WSCJX13.48N/A
N/A
Allspring Disciplined Small Cap R6

LIMAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIMAF has been loosely correlated with MGA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LIMAF jumps, then MGA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LIMAF
1D Price
Change %
LIMAF100%
+3.58%
MGA - LIMAF
56%
Loosely correlated
+4.30%
LEA - LIMAF
49%
Loosely correlated
+2.53%
AXL - LIMAF
48%
Loosely correlated
+3.06%
GT - LIMAF
48%
Loosely correlated
+3.94%
DAN - LIMAF
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.54%
More

MNTHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MNTHF and MRETF have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNTHF and MRETF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNTHF
1D Price
Change %
MNTHF100%
N/A
MRETF - MNTHF
5%
Poorly correlated
+3.89%
LIMAF - MNTHF
2%
Poorly correlated
+3.58%
MGDDF - MNTHF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MGDDY - MNTHF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.86%
MBUMY - MNTHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More