LINC vs UTI
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LINC is a Hold and UTI is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LINC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUTI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- LINC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- UTI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LINC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UTI’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LINC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- UTI’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
LINC (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а -4.18% price change this week, while UTI (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was +0.34% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was -2.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.14%.
Reported Earning Dates
LINC is expected to report earnings on Mar 03, 2025.
UTI is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (-2.30% weekly)The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.
| LINC | UTI | LINC / UTI | |
| Capitalization | 325M | 786M | 41% |
| EBITDA | 42.6M | 87.5M | 49% |
| Gain YTD | 59.761 | 109.345 | 55% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.05 | 52.25 | 23% |
| Revenue | 378M | 662M | 57% |
| Total Cash | 76M | 144M | 53% |
| Total Debt | 117M | 348M | 34% |
LINC | UTI | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 79 | 83 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 84 Overvalued | 81 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 3 | 4 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 80 | 69 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 35 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 3 | 92 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
UTI's Valuation (81) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as LINC (84). This means that UTI’s stock grew similarly to LINC’s over the last 12 months.
LINC's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as UTI (4). This means that LINC’s stock grew similarly to UTI’s over the last 12 months.
UTI's SMR Rating (69) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as LINC (80). This means that UTI’s stock grew similarly to LINC’s over the last 12 months.
UTI's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as LINC (38). This means that UTI’s stock grew similarly to LINC’s over the last 12 months.
LINC's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for UTI (92). This means that LINC’s stock grew significantly faster than UTI’s over the last 12 months.
| LINC | UTI | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 22 days ago 81% | 9 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 74% | 6 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 75% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| WLCVX | 21.82 | N/A | N/A |
| Wilshire Large Company Value Instl | |||
| WCMWX | 14.78 | -0.05 | -0.34% |
| WCM Focused Emerging Mkts Ex Chn Inst | |||
| HCAFX | 44.45 | -0.26 | -0.58% |
| Hartford Capital Appreciation F | |||
| EILVX | 26.13 | -0.16 | -0.61% |
| Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value I | |||
| OFAFX | 27.34 | -0.22 | -0.80% |
| Olstein All Cap Value Adv | |||
LINC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LINC has been loosely correlated with GHC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LINC jumps, then GHC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LINC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LINC | 100% | -2.14% | ||
| GHC - LINC | 50% Loosely correlated | -2.12% | ||
| AZZ - LINC | 46% Loosely correlated | -4.80% | ||
| FC - LINC | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.99% | ||
| RGP - LINC | 44% Loosely correlated | +1.64% | ||
| BCO - LINC | 44% Loosely correlated | -2.01% | ||
More | ||||