Ad is loading...
LIOPY
Price
$16.40
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Mar 22 closing price
ZOONF
Price
$0.01
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 31 closing price
Ad is loading...

LIOPY vs ZOONF

Header iconLIOPY vs ZOONF Comparison
Open Charts LIOPY vs ZOONFBanner chart's image
Lion
Price$16.40
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$274
CapitalizationN/A
ZOONO GROUP
Price$0.01
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.67K
CapitalizationN/A
LIOPY vs ZOONF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LIOPY vs. ZOONF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIOPY is a Hold and ZOONF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (LIOPY: $16.40 vs. ZOONF: $0.01)
Brand notoriety: LIOPY and ZOONF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Household/Personal Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LIOPY: 100% vs. ZOONF: 79%
Market capitalization -- LIOPY: $2.51B vs. ZOONF: $6.45M
LIOPY [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $2.51B. ZOONF’s [@Household/Personal Care] market capitalization is $6.45M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $381.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $24.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LIOPY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileZOONF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LIOPY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ZOONF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ZOONF is a better buy in the long-term than LIOPY.

Price Growth

LIOPY (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while ZOONF (@Household/Personal Care) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was -0.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.95%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (-0.27% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LIOPY($2.51B) has a higher market cap than ZOONF($6.45M). LIOPY has higher P/E ratio than ZOONF: LIOPY (24.17) vs ZOONF (19.42). LIOPY YTD gains are higher at: -15.044 vs. ZOONF (-66.555). LIOPY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 43.4B vs. ZOONF (-7.81M). LIOPY has more cash in the bank: 97.8B vs. ZOONF (4.56M). ZOONF has less debt than LIOPY: ZOONF (1.93M) vs LIOPY (30.3B). LIOPY has higher revenues than ZOONF: LIOPY (403B) vs ZOONF (4.14M).
LIOPYZOONFLIOPY / ZOONF
Capitalization2.51B6.45M38,924%
EBITDA43.4B-7.81M-555,647%
Gain YTD-15.044-66.55523%
P/E Ratio24.1719.42124%
Revenue403B4.14M9,743,714%
Total Cash97.8B4.56M2,144,737%
Total Debt30.3B1.93M1,569,135%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MLXIX29.140.26
+0.90%
Catalyst Energy Infrastructure I
SMCFX70.88-0.87
-1.21%
American Funds SMALLCAP World F2
CWVGX22.55-0.31
-1.36%
Calvert International Equity A
SCSCX63.45-0.99
-1.54%
Touchstone Large Cap Focused C
MSSCX9.83-0.19
-1.90%
AMG Frontier Small Cap Growth I

LIOPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LIOPY and KBYPF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LIOPY and KBYPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LIOPY
1D Price
Change %
LIOPY100%
N/A
KBYPF - LIOPY
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OLVI - LIOPY
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.74%
HNST - LIOPY
2%
Poorly correlated
+6.31%
KVUE - LIOPY
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.89%
ZOONF - LIOPY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

ZOONF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZOONF has been loosely correlated with LIOPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ZOONF jumps, then LIOPF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZOONF
1D Price
Change %
ZOONF100%
N/A
LIOPF - ZOONF
44%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HNST - ZOONF
1%
Poorly correlated
+6.31%
KBYPF - ZOONF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LIOPY - ZOONF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OLVI - ZOONF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-0.74%
More