Ad is loading...
LIT vs PICK
LIT vs PICK Comparison
Open Charts LIT vs PICK
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$42.59
Change-$0.25 (-0.58%)
Volume$248.65K
Net Assets1.07B
iShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF
Price$36.84
Change-$0.85 (-2.25%)
Volume$331.6K
Net Assets756.22M
LIT vs PICK Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LIT vs. PICK commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIT is a Buy and PICK is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LIT has more net assets: 1.07B vs. PICK (756M). PICK has a higher annual dividend yield than LIT: PICK (5.302) vs LIT (4.438). LIT was incepted earlier than PICK: LIT (15 years) vs PICK (13 years). LIT has a higher turnover PICK (13.00) vs PICK (13.00).
| LIT | PICK | LIT / PICK | |
| Gain YTD | 4.438 | 5.302 | 84% |
| Net Assets | 1.07B | 756M | 141% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 19.76 | 13.00 | 152% |
| Yield | 1.25 | 4.32 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LIT | PICK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 86% | 11 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 89% | 21 days ago 87% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
LIT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIT has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LIT jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LIT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIT | 100% | -0.58% | ||
| SQM - LIT | 81% Closely correlated | -0.35% | ||
| ALB - LIT | 78% Closely correlated | -1.59% | ||
| SGML - LIT | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.85% | ||
| PLL - LIT | 60% Loosely correlated | -4.12% | ||
| ALTM - LIT | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.17% | ||
More | ||||
PICK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PICK has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PICK jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PICK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PICK | 100% | -2.27% | ||
| BHP - PICK | 86% Closely correlated | -1.29% | ||
| FCX - PICK | 84% Closely correlated | -5.08% | ||
| RIO - PICK | 83% Closely correlated | -1.18% | ||
| SCCO - PICK | 79% Closely correlated | -5.02% | ||
| HBM - PICK | 76% Closely correlated | -6.70% | ||
More | ||||