Ad is loading...
LIT vs PICK
LIT vs PICK Comparison
Open Charts LIT vs PICK
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$41.93
Change-$1.52 (-3.50%)
Volume$3.18K
CapitalizationN/A
iShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF
Price$35.27
Change-$1.34 (-3.66%)
Volume$825
CapitalizationN/A
LIT vs PICK Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LIT vs. PICK commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIT is a Hold and PICK is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LIT has more net assets: 1.18B vs. PICK (808M). PICK has a higher annual dividend yield than LIT: PICK (-12.494) vs LIT (-14.169). LIT was incepted earlier than PICK: LIT (14 years) vs PICK (13 years). LIT has a higher turnover PICK (13.00) vs PICK (13.00).
| LIT | PICK | LIT / PICK | |
| Gain YTD | -14.169 | -12.494 | 113% |
| Net Assets | 1.18B | 808M | 146% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 19.76 | 13.00 | 152% |
| Yield | 1.25 | 4.32 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 13 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LIT | PICK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 87% | 20 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
LIT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIT has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LIT jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LIT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIT | 100% | -0.18% | ||
| SQM - LIT | 81% Closely correlated | +1.23% | ||
| ALB - LIT | 78% Closely correlated | -2.00% | ||
| PLL - LIT | 62% Loosely correlated | -6.99% | ||
| SGML - LIT | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.43% | ||
| TSLA - LIT | 51% Loosely correlated | +3.64% | ||
More | ||||
PICK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PICK has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PICK jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PICK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PICK | 100% | -0.78% | ||
| BHP - PICK | 86% Closely correlated | -0.22% | ||
| FCX - PICK | 84% Closely correlated | -0.29% | ||
| RIO - PICK | 83% Closely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| SCCO - PICK | 79% Closely correlated | -0.67% | ||
| HBM - PICK | 76% Closely correlated | -2.56% | ||
More | ||||