Ad is loading...
LIT vs PSCM
LIT vs PSCM Comparison
Open Charts LIT vs PSCM
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$42.28
Change+$0.66 (+1.59%)
Volume$337.84K
Net Assets1.07B
Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF
Price$74.98
Change+$0.47 (+0.63%)
Volume$1.88K
Net Assets17.23M
LIT vs PSCM Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LIT vs. PSCM commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIT is a Hold and PSCM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LIT has more net assets: 1.07B vs. PSCM (17.2M). LIT has a higher annual dividend yield than PSCM: LIT (3.678) vs PSCM (1.728). LIT was incepted earlier than PSCM: LIT (15 years) vs PSCM (15 years). LIT has a higher turnover PSCM (18.00) vs PSCM (18.00).
| LIT | PSCM | LIT / PSCM | |
| Gain YTD | 3.678 | 1.728 | 213% |
| Net Assets | 1.07B | 17.2M | 6,215% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 19.76 | 18.00 | 110% |
| Yield | 1.25 | 0.74 | 168% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LIT | PSCM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 77% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 86% | 12 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 86% | 12 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 87% | 14 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 88% | 12 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 86% | 12 days ago 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
LIT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIT has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LIT jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LIT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIT | 100% | +1.59% | ||
| SQM - LIT | 81% Closely correlated | +0.30% | ||
| ALB - LIT | 78% Closely correlated | +3.36% | ||
| PLL - LIT | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.93% | ||
| SGML - LIT | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.69% | ||
| ALTM - LIT | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.35% | ||
More | ||||
PSCM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PSCM has been closely correlated with FUL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PSCM jumps, then FUL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PSCM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSCM | 100% | +0.63% | ||
| FUL - PSCM | 76% Closely correlated | -0.21% | ||
| IOSP - PSCM | 75% Closely correlated | +1.39% | ||
| KWR - PSCM | 74% Closely correlated | +2.99% | ||
| MTRN - PSCM | 73% Closely correlated | +1.56% | ||
| MTUS - PSCM | 70% Closely correlated | +0.27% | ||
More | ||||