Ad is loading...
LIT vs PSCM
LIT vs PSCM Comparison
Open Charts LIT vs PSCM
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$41.93
Change-$1.52 (-3.50%)
Volume$3.18K
CapitalizationN/A
Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF
Price$78.08
Change+$0.20 (+0.26%)
Volume$1.3K
CapitalizationN/A
LIT vs PSCM Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LIT vs. PSCM commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIT is a Hold and PSCM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LIT has more net assets: 1.18B vs. PSCM (18.7M). PSCM has a higher annual dividend yield than LIT: PSCM (6.128) vs LIT (-14.169). LIT was incepted earlier than PSCM: LIT (14 years) vs PSCM (15 years). LIT has a higher turnover PSCM (18.00) vs PSCM (18.00).
| LIT | PSCM | LIT / PSCM | |
| Gain YTD | -14.169 | 6.128 | -231% |
| Net Assets | 1.18B | 18.7M | 6,316% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 19.76 | 18.00 | 110% |
| Yield | 1.25 | 0.74 | 168% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LIT | PSCM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 87% | 24 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
LIT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIT has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LIT jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LIT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIT | 100% | -0.18% | ||
| SQM - LIT | 81% Closely correlated | +1.23% | ||
| ALB - LIT | 78% Closely correlated | -2.00% | ||
| PLL - LIT | 62% Loosely correlated | -6.99% | ||
| SGML - LIT | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.43% | ||
| TSLA - LIT | 51% Loosely correlated | +3.64% | ||
More | ||||
PSCM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PSCM has been closely correlated with FUL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PSCM jumps, then FUL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PSCM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSCM | 100% | -1.96% | ||
| FUL - PSCM | 76% Closely correlated | -0.91% | ||
| IOSP - PSCM | 75% Closely correlated | -2.03% | ||
| KWR - PSCM | 74% Closely correlated | -2.01% | ||
| MTRN - PSCM | 73% Closely correlated | -1.45% | ||
| MTUS - PSCM | 70% Closely correlated | -2.80% | ||
More | ||||