Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LIT vs PYZ
LIT vs PYZ Comparison
Open Charts LIT vs PYZ
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$59.38
Change+$0.62 (+1.06%)
Volume$411
Net Assets1.33B
Invesco DW Basic Materials Momt ETF
Price$109.46
Change+$1.27 (+1.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets56.68M
LIT vs PYZ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LIT vs. PYZ commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIT is a StrongBuy and PYZ is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LIT has more net assets: 1.33B vs. PYZ (56.7M). LIT has a higher annual dividend yield than PYZ: LIT (44.602) vs PYZ (25.552). LIT was incepted earlier than PYZ: LIT (15 years) vs PYZ (19 years). PYZ (0.60) has a lower expense ratio than LIT (0.75). PYZ has a higher turnover LIT (22.87) vs LIT (22.87).
| LIT | PYZ | LIT / PYZ | |
| Gain YTD | 44.602 | 25.552 | 175% |
| Net Assets | 1.33B | 56.7M | 2,344% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.60 | 125% |
| Turnover | 22.87 | 69.00 | 33% |
| Yield | 0.47 | 0.84 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LIT | PYZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 29 days ago 88% | 22 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
LIT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIT has been closely correlated with ALB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LIT jumps, then ALB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LIT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIT | 100% | -1.39% | ||
| ALB - LIT | 72% Closely correlated | -1.63% | ||
| SQM - LIT | 71% Closely correlated | +0.51% | ||
| LAR - LIT | 59% Loosely correlated | +14.71% | ||
| SGML - LIT | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.13% | ||
| RIVN - LIT | 47% Loosely correlated | -1.78% | ||
More | ||||
PYZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PYZ has been closely correlated with MTUS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PYZ jumps, then MTUS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PYZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PYZ | 100% | -0.74% | ||
| MTUS - PYZ | 79% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| ASIX - PYZ | 74% Closely correlated | +1.14% | ||
| ZEUS - PYZ | 71% Closely correlated | +0.71% | ||
| PPG - PYZ | 70% Closely correlated | -1.76% | ||
| WY - PYZ | 66% Closely correlated | -2.16% | ||
More | ||||