102 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...
LIT vs SGML
LIT vs SGML Comparison
Open Charts LIT vs SGML
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$42.28
Change+$0.66 (+1.59%)
Volume$337.84K
Net Assets1.07B
Sigma Lithium
Price$12.01
Change+$0.20 (+1.69%)
Volume$289.71K
Capitalization1.54B
LIT vs SGML Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LIT vs. SGML commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIT is a Hold and SGML is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SGML: Fundamental Ratings
SGML | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 15 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 90 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 65 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 25 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LIT | SGML | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 90% | 11 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 77% | 11 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 11 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 11 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 86% | 11 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 86% | 11 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 87% | 17 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 88% | 11 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 11 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 86% | 11 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
LIT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIT has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LIT jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LIT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIT | 100% | +1.59% | ||
| SQM - LIT | 81% Closely correlated | +0.30% | ||
| ALB - LIT | 78% Closely correlated | +3.36% | ||
| PLL - LIT | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.93% | ||
| SGML - LIT | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.69% | ||
| ALTM - LIT | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.35% | ||
More | ||||
SGML and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SGML has been loosely correlated with LAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SGML jumps, then LAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SGML | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SGML | 100% | +1.69% | ||
| LAC - SGML | 50% Loosely correlated | +1.45% | ||
| PLL - SGML | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.93% | ||
| PILBF - SGML | 45% Loosely correlated | +1.22% | ||
| GLNCY - SGML | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.57% | ||
| BHP - SGML | 42% Loosely correlated | +1.07% | ||
More | ||||