Ad is loading...
LIT vs TINT
LIT vs TINT Comparison
Open Charts LIT vs TINT
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$41.93
Change-$1.52 (-3.50%)
Volume$3.18K
CapitalizationN/A
ProShares Smart Materials ETF
Price$31.23
Change+$0.03 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
LIT vs TINT Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LIT vs. TINT commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIT is a Hold and TINT is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LIT has more net assets: 1.18B vs. TINT (1.51M). TINT has a higher annual dividend yield than LIT: TINT (-7.451) vs LIT (-14.169). LIT was incepted earlier than TINT: LIT (14 years) vs TINT (3 years). TINT has a higher turnover LIT (19.76) vs LIT (19.76).
| LIT | TINT | LIT / TINT | |
| Gain YTD | -14.169 | -7.451 | 190% |
| Net Assets | 1.18B | 1.51M | 78,057% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 19.76 | 45.00 | 44% |
| Yield | 1.25 | 0.88 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LIT | TINT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 87% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 22 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
LIT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIT has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LIT jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LIT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIT | 100% | -0.18% | ||
| SQM - LIT | 81% Closely correlated | +1.23% | ||
| ALB - LIT | 78% Closely correlated | -2.00% | ||
| PLL - LIT | 62% Loosely correlated | -6.99% | ||
| SGML - LIT | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.43% | ||
| TSLA - LIT | 51% Loosely correlated | +3.64% | ||
More | ||||
TINT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TINT has been loosely correlated with PPG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TINT jumps, then PPG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TINT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TINT | 100% | N/A | ||
| PPG - TINT | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.47% | ||
| MTRN - TINT | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.45% | ||
| HUN - TINT | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.33% | ||
| CBT - TINT | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.79% | ||
| OLED - TINT | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.81% | ||
More | ||||