Ad is loading...
LIT vs TINT
LIT vs TINT Comparison
Open Charts LIT vs TINT
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$39.84
Change-$0.91 (-2.23%)
Volume$2.48K
Net Assets985.19M
ProShares Smart Materials ETF
Price$30.02
Change-$0.34 (-1.12%)
Volume$100
Net Assets1.51M
LIT vs TINT Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LIT vs. TINT commentary
Mar 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIT is a Hold and TINT is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LIT has more net assets: 985M vs. TINT (1.51M). TINT has a higher annual dividend yield than LIT: TINT (4.226) vs LIT (-0.074). LIT was incepted earlier than TINT: LIT (15 years) vs TINT (3 years). TINT (0.58) has a lower expense ratio than LIT (0.75). TINT has a higher turnover LIT (22.87) vs LIT (22.87).
| LIT | TINT | LIT / TINT | |
| Gain YTD | -0.074 | 4.226 | -2% |
| Net Assets | 985M | 1.51M | 65,059% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.58 | 129% |
| Turnover | 22.87 | 45.00 | 51% |
| Yield | 0.93 | 1.43 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LIT | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
LIT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIT has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LIT jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LIT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIT | 100% | -0.54% | ||
| SQM - LIT | 81% Closely correlated | -0.19% | ||
| ALB - LIT | 78% Closely correlated | -1.27% | ||
| SGML - LIT | 61% Loosely correlated | -2.33% | ||
| PLL - LIT | 59% Loosely correlated | +11.15% | ||
| ALTM - LIT | 55% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
TINT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TINT has been loosely correlated with MTRN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TINT jumps, then MTRN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TINT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TINT | 100% | N/A | ||
| MTRN - TINT | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.36% | ||
| RPM - TINT | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.48% | ||
| OLED - TINT | 54% Loosely correlated | +6.42% | ||
| SKYT - TINT | 53% Loosely correlated | +1.10% | ||
| ENTG - TINT | 52% Loosely correlated | +2.65% | ||
More | ||||