Ad is loading...
LIT vs XME
LIT vs XME Comparison
Open Charts LIT vs XME
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$42.20
Change-$0.08 (-0.19%)
Volume$232.4K
Net Assets1.07B
SPDR® S&P Metals and Mining ETF
Price$61.21
Change+$0.88 (+1.46%)
Volume$1.26M
Net Assets1.66B
LIT vs XME Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LIT vs. XME commentary
Jan 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIT is a Hold and XME is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XME has more net assets: 1.66B vs. LIT (1.07B). XME has a higher annual dividend yield than LIT: XME (7.859) vs LIT (3.482). LIT was incepted earlier than XME: LIT (15 years) vs XME (19 years). XME has a higher turnover LIT (19.76) vs LIT (19.76).
| LIT | XME | LIT / XME | |
| Gain YTD | 3.482 | 7.859 | 44% |
| Net Assets | 1.07B | 1.66B | 65% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 19.76 | 33.00 | 60% |
| Yield | 1.25 | 0.88 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LIT | XME | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 90% | 14 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 77% | 14 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 14 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 14 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 86% | 14 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 86% | 14 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 87% | 20 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 88% | 14 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 86% | 14 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
LIT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIT has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LIT jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LIT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIT | 100% | -0.19% | ||
| SQM - LIT | 81% Closely correlated | -0.77% | ||
| ALB - LIT | 78% Closely correlated | -3.53% | ||
| PLL - LIT | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.17% | ||
| SGML - LIT | 60% Loosely correlated | -3.91% | ||
| ALTM - LIT | 57% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
XME and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XME has been closely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XME jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XME | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XME | 100% | +1.46% | ||
| FCX - XME | 74% Closely correlated | +0.20% | ||
| AA - XME | 72% Closely correlated | -2.33% | ||
| CMC - XME | 71% Closely correlated | +2.13% | ||
| STLD - XME | 70% Closely correlated | -0.91% | ||
| CENX - XME | 68% Closely correlated | -1.42% | ||
More | ||||