Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LIT vs XME
LIT vs XME Comparison
Open Charts LIT vs XME
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$52.61
Change+$0.04 (+0.08%)
Volume$1.18K
Net Assets1.18B
SPDR® S&P Metals and Mining ETF
Price$89.04
Change+$1.29 (+1.47%)
Volume$15.21K
Net Assets2.51B
LIT vs XME Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LIT vs. XME commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIT is a Buy and XME is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XME has more net assets: 2.51B vs. LIT (1.18B). XME has a higher annual dividend yield than LIT: XME (55.025) vs LIT (29.369). LIT was incepted earlier than XME: LIT (15 years) vs XME (19 years). XME (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than LIT (0.75). XME has a higher turnover LIT (22.87) vs LIT (22.87).
| LIT | XME | LIT / XME | |
| Gain YTD | 29.369 | 55.025 | 53% |
| Net Assets | 1.18B | 2.51B | 47% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.35 | 214% |
| Turnover | 22.87 | 43.00 | 53% |
| Yield | 0.56 | 0.40 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LIT | XME | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 85% | 8 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
LIT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIT has been closely correlated with ALB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LIT jumps, then ALB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LIT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIT | 100% | +1.39% | ||
| ALB - LIT | 74% Closely correlated | -0.96% | ||
| SQM - LIT | 74% Closely correlated | -0.69% | ||
| LAR - LIT | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.31% | ||
| SGML - LIT | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.53% | ||
| RIVN - LIT | 47% Loosely correlated | -1.47% | ||
More | ||||
XME and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XME has been closely correlated with CMC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XME jumps, then CMC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XME | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XME | 100% | -0.56% | ||
| CMC - XME | 72% Closely correlated | +0.48% | ||
| STLD - XME | 72% Closely correlated | -2.02% | ||
| KALU - XME | 71% Closely correlated | -0.72% | ||
| NUE - XME | 71% Closely correlated | -0.09% | ||
| AA - XME | 71% Closely correlated | -1.85% | ||
More | ||||