Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LIT vs XME
LIT vs XME Comparison
Open Charts LIT vs XME
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$42.58
Change+$0.37 (+0.88%)
Volume$258
Net Assets946.02M
SPDR® S&P Metals and Mining ETF
Price$77.73
Change+$2.32 (+3.08%)
Volume$2.19K
Net Assets2.14B
LIT vs XME Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LIT vs. XME commentary
Aug 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIT is a Hold and XME is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XME has more net assets: 2.14B vs. LIT (946M). XME has a higher annual dividend yield than LIT: XME (33.224) vs LIT (3.874). LIT was incepted earlier than XME: LIT (15 years) vs XME (19 years). XME (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than LIT (0.75). XME has a higher turnover LIT (22.87) vs LIT (22.87).
| LIT | XME | LIT / XME | |
| Gain YTD | 3.874 | 33.224 | 12% |
| Net Assets | 946M | 2.14B | 44% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.35 | 214% |
| Turnover | 22.87 | 43.00 | 53% |
| Yield | 0.65 | 0.45 | 144% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LIT | XME | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 89% | 7 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
XME and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XME has been closely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XME jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XME | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XME | 100% | -0.22% | ||
| FCX - XME | 78% Closely correlated | -0.42% | ||
| CMC - XME | 75% Closely correlated | +0.02% | ||
| KALU - XME | 73% Closely correlated | -0.85% | ||
| NUE - XME | 73% Closely correlated | -0.67% | ||
| STLD - XME | 73% Closely correlated | -1.05% | ||
More | ||||