Ad is loading...
LIT vs XME
LIT vs XME Comparison
Open Charts LIT vs XME
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$42.59
Change-$0.25 (-0.58%)
Volume$248.65K
Net Assets1.06B
SPDR® S&P Metals and Mining ETF
Price$58.65
Change-$2.59 (-4.23%)
Volume$2.35M
Net Assets1.65B
LIT vs XME Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LIT vs. XME commentary
Feb 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIT is a Buy and XME is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XME has more net assets: 1.65B vs. LIT (1.06B). XME has a higher annual dividend yield than LIT: XME (7.912) vs LIT (5.051). LIT was incepted earlier than XME: LIT (15 years) vs XME (19 years). XME has a higher turnover LIT (19.76) vs LIT (19.76).
| LIT | XME | LIT / XME | |
| Gain YTD | 5.051 | 7.912 | 64% |
| Net Assets | 1.06B | 1.65B | 64% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 19.76 | 33.00 | 60% |
| Yield | 1.25 | 0.88 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LIT | XME | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% | 18 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 89% | 11 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
LIT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIT has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LIT jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LIT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIT | 100% | +1.42% | ||
| SQM - LIT | 81% Closely correlated | +2.55% | ||
| ALB - LIT | 78% Closely correlated | -1.39% | ||
| SGML - LIT | 61% Loosely correlated | +4.55% | ||
| PLL - LIT | 60% Loosely correlated | +3.66% | ||
| ALTM - LIT | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.17% | ||
More | ||||
XME and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XME has been closely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XME jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XME | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XME | 100% | +0.34% | ||
| FCX - XME | 74% Closely correlated | +1.01% | ||
| AA - XME | 72% Closely correlated | +2.96% | ||
| CMC - XME | 69% Closely correlated | -1.59% | ||
| STLD - XME | 69% Closely correlated | -1.24% | ||
| CENX - XME | 68% Closely correlated | -3.84% | ||
More | ||||