LITB
Price
$1.16
Change
-$0.05 (-4.17%)
Updated
Jul 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
21.11M
RERE
Price
$3.52
Change
+$0.16 (+4.76%)
Updated
Jul 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
746.08M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LITB vs RERE

Header iconLITB vs RERE Comparison
Open Charts LITB vs REREBanner chart's image
LightInTheBox Holding
Price$1.16
Change-$0.05 (-4.17%)
Volume$100
Capitalization21.11M
ATRenew
Price$3.52
Change+$0.16 (+4.76%)
Volume$51.28K
Capitalization746.08M
LITB vs RERE Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LITB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RERE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LITB vs. RERE commentary
Jul 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LITB is a Hold and RERE is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 03, 2025
Stock price -- (LITB: $1.20 vs. RERE: $3.36)
Brand notoriety: LITB and RERE are both not notable
Both companies represent the Internet Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LITB: 61% vs. RERE: 203%
Market capitalization -- LITB: $21.93M vs. RERE: $746.08M
LITB [@Internet Retail] is valued at $21.93M. RERE’s [@Internet Retail] market capitalization is $746.08M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Retail] industry ranges from $2.33T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Retail] industry is $45.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LITB’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRERE’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LITB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RERE’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RERE is a better buy in the long-term than LITB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LITB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RERE’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LITB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • RERE’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RERE is a better buy in the short-term than LITB.

Price Growth

LITB (@Internet Retail) experienced а +6.12% price change this week, while RERE (@Internet Retail) price change was +12.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Retail industry was +4.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +60.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

LITB is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2025.

RERE is expected to report earnings on Apr 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Internet Retail (+4.47% weekly)

The internet retail industry includes companies that sell products and services through the Internet. With more and more consumers using online retailers, the companies have seen a big increase in the use of their services. Some of the companies in the group are focused on selling business-to-business products and services. Others sell business-to-consumer products and services. Internet retailers offer a wide variety of products like books, apparel, and electronics. Some companies even specialize in only one or two categories. One potentially critical factor for players to thrive in this space is the quality and speed of product delivery. This requires an investment in efficient distribution networks. Things like logistics are important factors in the success in the extremely competitive industry. For a company to stay relevant in the industry it must have effective pricing strategies and upgraded websites. The websites must be easy to navigate and engaging for customers. In addition to the revenues generated from straight sales, internet retailers can generate revenue from subscription fees and advertising. Amazon.com, Inc., Alibaba Group, and JD.com are some of the global leaders.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERE($746M) has a higher market cap than LITB($21.1M). RERE has higher P/E ratio than LITB: RERE (35.62) vs LITB (9.63). RERE YTD gains are higher at: 16.667 vs. LITB (-28.571). RERE has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 152M vs. LITB (1.42M). RERE has more cash in the bank: 2.39B vs. LITB (15.9M). LITB has less debt than RERE: LITB (8.45M) vs RERE (357M). RERE has higher revenues than LITB: RERE (17.5B) vs LITB (231M).
LITBRERELITB / RERE
Capitalization21.1M746M3%
EBITDA1.42M152M1%
Gain YTD-28.57116.667-171%
P/E Ratio9.6335.6227%
Revenue231M17.5B1%
Total Cash15.9M2.39B1%
Total Debt8.45M357M2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LITB: Fundamental Ratings
LITB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
92
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
58
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LITBRERE
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LITB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RERE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CMI329.622.12
+0.65%
Cummins
TCPC7.730.03
+0.39%
BlackRock TCP Capital Corp
ATER1.66N/A
N/A
Aterian
RELY18.46-0.31
-1.65%
Remitly Global
ASPI7.00-0.36
-4.89%
ASP Isotopes

LITB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LITB and BZUN have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LITB and BZUN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LITB
1D Price
Change %
LITB100%
+4.62%
BZUN - LITB
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CPNG - LITB
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.10%
RERE - LITB
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.72%
JMIA - LITB
21%
Poorly correlated
+16.17%
W - LITB
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.66%
More

RERE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RERE has been loosely correlated with VIPS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RERE jumps, then VIPS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RERE
1D Price
Change %
RERE100%
-3.72%
VIPS - RERE
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.33%
BABA - RERE
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.49%
JD - RERE
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.18%
BZUN - RERE
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PDD - RERE
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.79%
More