LITM
Price
$0.89
Change
+$0.01 (+1.14%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
20.32M
MANVF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
1.71M
Ad is loading...

LITM vs MANVF

Header iconLITM vs MANVF Comparison
Open Charts LITM vs MANVFBanner chart's image
Snow Lake Resources
Price$0.89
Change+$0.01 (+1.14%)
Volume$5.81M
Capitalization20.32M
MANNING VENTURES
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$10K
Capitalization1.71M
LITM vs MANVF Comparison Chart
Loading...
LITM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MANVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LITM vs. MANVF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LITM is a Hold and MANVF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (LITM: $0.89 vs. MANVF: $0.02)
Brand notoriety: LITM and MANVF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LITM: 23% vs. MANVF: 214%
Market capitalization -- LITM: $20.32M vs. MANVF: $1.71M
LITM [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $20.32M. MANVF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $1.71M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LITM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMANVF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LITM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MANVF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LITM is a better buy in the long-term than MANVF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LITM’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MANVF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LITM’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MANVF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MANVF is a better buy in the short-term than LITM.

Price Growth

LITM (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +31.08% price change this week, while MANVF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -17.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.96%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.34% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LITM($20.3M) has a higher market cap than MANVF($1.71M). LITM YTD gains are higher at: -7.302 vs. MANVF (-33.653). MANVF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.01M vs. LITM (-2.56M). LITM has more cash in the bank: 30.8M vs. MANVF (1.73M). LITM (0) and MANVF (0) have equivalent revenues.
LITMMANVFLITM / MANVF
Capitalization20.3M1.71M1,186%
EBITDA-2.56M-1.01M253%
Gain YTD-7.302-33.65322%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash30.8M1.73M1,784%
Total Debt782KN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LITMMANVF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
80%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LITM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MANVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PBH78.580.30
+0.38%
Prestige Consumer Healthcare
SLI1.68N/A
N/A
Standard Lithium Ltd
TSN55.71-0.31
-0.55%
Tyson Foods
CVAC4.10-0.08
-1.91%
CureVac NV
BENF0.65-0.04
-5.67%
Beneficient

LITM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LITM has been loosely correlated with GRFX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LITM jumps, then GRFX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LITM
1D Price
Change %
LITM100%
+1.11%
GRFX - LITM
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.28%
NMG - LITM
28%
Poorly correlated
+4.63%
CASXF - LITM
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ERO - LITM
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.80%
SCCO - LITM
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.72%
More

MANVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MANVF and SJRNF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MANVF and SJRNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MANVF
1D Price
Change %
MANVF100%
N/A
SJRNF - MANVF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TWRFF - MANVF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LQRCF - MANVF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LITM - MANVF
10%
Poorly correlated
+1.11%
NVLHF - MANVF
8%
Poorly correlated
+4.21%
More