Ad is loading...
96 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...
LITP vs PLL
LITP vs PLL Comparison
Open Charts LITP vs PLL
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
Price$8.46
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$4.64K
CapitalizationN/A
Piedmont Lithium
Price$12.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.39M
CapitalizationN/A
LITP vs PLL Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LITP vs. PLL commentary
Nov 23, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LITP is a StrongSell and PLL is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PLL: Fundamental Ratings
PLL | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 12 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 35 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 92 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LITP | PLL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 5 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 87% | 5 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 5 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 10 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 90% | 8 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
LITP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LITP has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LITP jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LITP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LITP | 100% | +0.36% | ||
| SQM - LITP | 77% Closely correlated | +2.30% | ||
| ALB - LITP | 77% Closely correlated | -0.52% | ||
| PLL - LITP | 71% Closely correlated | +15.09% | ||
| LAC - LITP | 59% Loosely correlated | +6.30% | ||
| SGML - LITP | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.31% | ||
More | ||||
PLL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLL has been loosely correlated with LAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PLL jumps, then LAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PLL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLL | 100% | +15.09% | ||
| LAC - PLL | 55% Loosely correlated | +6.30% | ||
| MP - PLL | 53% Loosely correlated | +2.74% | ||
| SGML - PLL | 51% Loosely correlated | +1.31% | ||
| BHP - PLL | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.48% | ||
| FSUGY - PLL | 48% Loosely correlated | +2.20% | ||
More | ||||