Ad is loading...
LITP vs VAW
LITP vs VAW Comparison
Open Charts LITP vs VAW
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
Price$5.02
Change-$0.85 (-14.48%)
Volume$195
Net Assets12.87M
Vanguard Materials ETF
Price$172.71
Change-$9.43 (-5.18%)
Volume$707
Net Assets3.97B
LITP vs VAW Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LITP vs. VAW commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LITP is a Hold and VAW is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VAW has more net assets: 3.97B vs. LITP (12.9M). VAW has a higher annual dividend yield than LITP: VAW (-2.614) vs LITP (-12.126). LITP was incepted earlier than VAW: LITP (2 years) vs VAW (21 years). VAW (0.09) has a lower expense ratio than LITP (0.65). LITP has a higher turnover VAW (12.00) vs VAW (12.00).
| LITP | VAW | LITP / VAW | |
| Gain YTD | -12.126 | -2.614 | 464% |
| Net Assets | 12.9M | 3.97B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.09 | 722% |
| Turnover | 59.00 | 12.00 | 492% |
| Yield | 7.37 | 1.77 | 416% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 21 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LITP | VAW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 8 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
LITP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LITP has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LITP jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LITP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LITP | 100% | N/A | ||
| SQM - LITP | 77% Closely correlated | -0.91% | ||
| ALB - LITP | 77% Closely correlated | -7.96% | ||
| PLL - LITP | 71% Closely correlated | -5.75% | ||
| SGML - LITP | 59% Loosely correlated | -9.88% | ||
| LAC - LITP | 58% Loosely correlated | -2.17% | ||
More | ||||
VAW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VAW has been closely correlated with CE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VAW jumps, then CE could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y