LKFLF
Price
$3.27
Change
+$0.77 (+30.80%)
Updated
Aug 12 closing price
Capitalization
1.84B
PNDZF
Price
$138.50
Change
-$30.60 (-18.10%)
Updated
Aug 25 closing price
Capitalization
10.7B
Interact to see
Advertisement

LKFLF vs PNDZF

Header iconLKFLF vs PNDZF Comparison
Open Charts LKFLF vs PNDZFBanner chart's image
Luk Fook Holdings International
Price$3.27
Change+$0.77 (+30.80%)
Volume$1.2K
Capitalization1.84B
Pandora A/S
Price$138.50
Change-$30.60 (-18.10%)
Volume$311
Capitalization10.7B
LKFLF vs PNDZF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LKFLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PNDZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LKFLF vs. PNDZF commentary
Aug 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LKFLF is a Buy and PNDZF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 30, 2025
Stock price -- (LKFLF: $3.27 vs. PNDZF: $138.50)
Brand notoriety: LKFLF and PNDZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Catalog/Specialty Distribution industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LKFLF: 19% vs. PNDZF: 135%
Market capitalization -- LKFLF: $1.78B vs. PNDZF: $10.7B
LKFLF [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] is valued at $1.78B. PNDZF’s [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] market capitalization is $10.7B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] industry ranges from $290.27B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] industry is $38.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LKFLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePNDZF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LKFLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PNDZF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LKFLF is a better buy in the long-term than PNDZF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LKFLF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PNDZF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LKFLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PNDZF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LKFLF is a better buy in the short-term than PNDZF.

Price Growth

LKFLF (@Catalog/Specialty Distribution) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PNDZF (@Catalog/Specialty Distribution) price change was -18.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Catalog/Specialty Distribution industry was +2.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.55%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Catalog/Specialty Distribution (+2.52% weekly)

The catalog and specialty distribution industry includes companies that offer retail through mail-order houses, media, online social platforms, mobile apps and other channels outside of brick-and-mortar stores. Several companies in this business partner with retail companies to assist them with marketing, digital solutions, warehousing, and/or other distribution capabilities. In essence, the industry acts as a potential catalyst for retailers/brands to widen their reach among customers. Pinduoduo Inc., Qurate Retail, Inc. and Baozun are some of the major players in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PNDZF($10.7B) has a higher market cap than LKFLF($1.84B). LKFLF (13.61) and PNDZF (13.13) have similar P/E ratio . LKFLF YTD gains are higher at: 94.643 vs. PNDZF (-22.007).
LKFLFPNDZFLKFLF / PNDZF
Capitalization1.84B10.7B17%
EBITDAN/A10.3B-
Gain YTD94.643-22.007-430%
P/E Ratio13.6113.13104%
RevenueN/A32.5B-
Total CashN/A817M-
Total DebtN/A16.1B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LKFLF vs PNDZF: Fundamental Ratings
LKFLF
PNDZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3796
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6053
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3784
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LKFLF's Valuation (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PNDZF (66). This means that LKFLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PNDZF’s over the last 12 months.

PNDZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as LKFLF (60). This means that PNDZF’s stock grew similarly to LKFLF’s over the last 12 months.

PNDZF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as LKFLF (100). This means that PNDZF’s stock grew similarly to LKFLF’s over the last 12 months.

LKFLF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PNDZF (84). This means that LKFLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PNDZF’s over the last 12 months.

LKFLF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PNDZF (100). This means that LKFLF’s stock grew similarly to PNDZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LKFLFPNDZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
24%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LKFLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PNDZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FSBKX21.87N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes Global Allocation R
ECASX27.96N/A
N/A
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap C
ADOIX18.88N/A
N/A
Axs Dynamic Opportunity I
TQSAX24.59N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Integrated US SMCC Eq Adv
TQCRX19.89N/A
N/A
Touchstone Dividend Equity R6

LKFLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LKFLF and CJEWY have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LKFLF and CJEWY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LKFLF
1D Price
Change %
LKFLF100%
N/A
CJEWY - LKFLF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHDRF - LKFLF
28%
Poorly correlated
+6.59%
BCUCY - LKFLF
28%
Poorly correlated
-5.04%
SWGAY - LKFLF
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.03%
BBRYF - LKFLF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PNDZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PNDZF and DCOHF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PNDZF and DCOHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PNDZF
1D Price
Change %
PNDZF100%
N/A
DCOHF - PNDZF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LKFLF - PNDZF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LVMHF - PNDZF
8%
Poorly correlated
+2.97%
PPRUF - PNDZF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LVMUY - PNDZF
8%
Poorly correlated
+2.96%
More