Advertisement
LKQ vs SAFT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LKQ is a Hold and SAFT is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LKQ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSAFT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- LKQ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SAFT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LKQ’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAFT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LKQ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- SAFT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
LKQ (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -3.86% price change this week, while SAFT (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -1.86% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +0.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.42%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +0.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.18%.
Reported Earning Dates
LKQ is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.
SAFT is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Auto Parts: OEM (+0.17% weekly)OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.
@Property/Casualty Insurance (+0.15% weekly)Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
| LKQ | SAFT | LKQ / SAFT | |
| Capitalization | 14.2B | 1.22B | 1,168% |
| EBITDA | 1.77B | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.477 | -10.932 | -32% |
| P/E Ratio | 15.10 | 63.23 | 24% |
| Revenue | 13.9B | 926M | 1,501% |
| Total Cash | 299M | 518M | 58% |
| Total Debt | 5.64B | 49.8M | 11,321% |
LKQ | SAFT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 12 | 61 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 50 Fair valued | 50 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 56 | 66 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 78 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LKQ's Valuation (50) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry is in the same range as SAFT (50) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that LKQ’s stock grew similarly to SAFT’s over the last 12 months.
LKQ's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry is in the same range as SAFT (66) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that LKQ’s stock grew similarly to SAFT’s over the last 12 months.
LKQ's SMR Rating (100) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry is in the same range as SAFT (100) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that LKQ’s stock grew similarly to SAFT’s over the last 12 months.
LKQ's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry is in the same range as SAFT (78) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that LKQ’s stock grew similarly to SAFT’s over the last 12 months.
LKQ's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry is in the same range as SAFT (100) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that LKQ’s stock grew similarly to SAFT’s over the last 12 months.
| LKQ | SAFT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 56% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 54% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 45% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 56% | 17 days ago 57% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 6 days ago 54% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 40% |
Advertisement
LKQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LKQ has been loosely correlated with GTX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LKQ jumps, then GTX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LKQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LKQ | 100% | -2.32% | ||
| GTX - LKQ | 47% Loosely correlated | -2.90% | ||
| THRM - LKQ | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.70% | ||
| GNTX - LKQ | 42% Loosely correlated | -1.73% | ||
| BWA - LKQ | 41% Loosely correlated | -1.91% | ||
| MGA - LKQ | 40% Loosely correlated | -1.27% | ||
More | ||||
SAFT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAFT has been closely correlated with CNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SAFT jumps, then CNA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SAFT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAFT | 100% | -2.20% | ||
| CNA - SAFT | 67% Closely correlated | -1.90% | ||
| HMN - SAFT | 67% Closely correlated | -1.98% | ||
| UFCS - SAFT | 67% Closely correlated | -3.46% | ||
| L - SAFT | 66% Loosely correlated | -1.98% | ||
| CINF - SAFT | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.32% | ||
More | ||||