SAFT
Price
$103.39
Change
+$0.20 (+0.19%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
1.52B
2 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UFCS
Price
$51.36
Change
-$0.69 (-1.33%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
1.32B
Earnings call today
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SAFT vs UFCS

SAFT vs UFCS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SAFT vs. UFCS commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SAFT is a StrongBuy and UFCS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (SAFT: $103.39 vs. UFCS: $51.36)
Brand notoriety: SAFT and UFCS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SAFT: 145% vs. UFCS: 55%
Market capitalization -- SAFT: $1.52B vs. UFCS: $1.32B
SAFT [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $1.52B. UFCS’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $1.32B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $135.29B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $13.74B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SAFT’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileUFCS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SAFT’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • UFCS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, UFCS is a better buy in the long-term than SAFT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SAFT’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UFCS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SAFT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UFCS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SAFT is a better buy in the short-term than UFCS.

Price Growth

SAFT (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +0.18% price change this week, while UFCS (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +0.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +0.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

SAFT is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

UFCS is expected to report earnings on Aug 03, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+0.46% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SAFT($1.52B) has a higher market cap than UFCS($1.32B). SAFT has higher P/E ratio than UFCS: SAFT (24.44) vs UFCS (10.35). UFCS YTD gains are higher at: 42.692 vs. SAFT (36.080). UFCS has more cash in the bank: 1.34B vs. SAFT (753M). SAFT has less debt than UFCS: SAFT (61.1M) vs UFCS (146M). UFCS has higher revenues than SAFT: UFCS (1.43B) vs SAFT (1.27B).
SAFTUFCSSAFT / UFCS
Capitalization1.52B1.32B115%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD36.08042.69285%
P/E Ratio24.4410.35236%
Revenue1.27B1.43B89%
Total Cash753M1.34B56%
Total Debt61.1M146M42%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SAFT vs UFCS: Fundamental Ratings
SAFT
UFCS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5075
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3029
SMR RATING
1..100
8160
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3637
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1350
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SAFT's Valuation (31) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as UFCS (36). This means that SAFT’s stock grew similarly to UFCS’s over the last 12 months.

UFCS's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as SAFT (30). This means that UFCS’s stock grew similarly to SAFT’s over the last 12 months.

UFCS's SMR Rating (60) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as SAFT (81). This means that UFCS’s stock grew similarly to SAFT’s over the last 12 months.

SAFT's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as UFCS (37). This means that SAFT’s stock grew similarly to UFCS’s over the last 12 months.

SAFT's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UFCS (50). This means that SAFT’s stock grew somewhat faster than UFCS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SAFTUFCS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SAFT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UFCS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QQQH53.540.18
+0.33%
NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hdg Eq Inc ETF
TBX28.820.05
+0.17%
ProShares Short 7-10 Year Treasury
GSSC89.15-0.34
-0.38%
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta® US SmCp Eq ETF
LOUP85.11-1.11
-1.29%
Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF
BFJL17.17-0.22
-1.29%
FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July

SAFT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAFT has been loosely correlated with HMN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SAFT jumps, then HMN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SAFT
1D Price
Change %
SAFT100%
+0.19%
HMN - SAFT
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.19%
HIG - SAFT
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.80%
THG - SAFT
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.10%
AFG - SAFT
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.01%
L - SAFT
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.31%
More