LKSGF
Price
$0.01
Change
-$0.07 (-87.50%)
Updated
May 20 closing price
Capitalization
66.39M
PSGTY
Price
$2.90
Change
-$0.36 (-11.04%)
Updated
May 20 closing price
Capitalization
3.01B
Interact to see
Advertisement

LKSGF vs PSGTY

Header iconLKSGF vs PSGTY Comparison
Open Charts LKSGF vs PSGTYBanner chart's image
Luks Group Vietnam Holdings
Price$0.01
Change-$0.07 (-87.50%)
Volume$240
Capitalization66.39M
Pt Semen Indonesia (Persero) Tbk
Price$2.90
Change-$0.36 (-11.04%)
Volume$1.12K
Capitalization3.01B
LKSGF vs PSGTY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LKSGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PSGTY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LKSGF vs. PSGTY commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LKSGF is a Hold and PSGTY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (LKSGF: $0.01 vs. PSGTY: $2.78)
Brand notoriety: LKSGF and PSGTY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LKSGF: 10% vs. PSGTY: 128%
Market capitalization -- LKSGF: $66.39M vs. PSGTY: $3.01B
LKSGF [@Construction Materials] is valued at $66.39M. PSGTY’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $3.01B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $59.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $8.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LKSGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePSGTY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • LKSGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PSGTY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, PSGTY is a better buy in the long-term than LKSGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LKSGF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PSGTY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LKSGF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • PSGTY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LKSGF is a better buy in the short-term than PSGTY.

Price Growth

LKSGF (@Construction Materials) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PSGTY (@Construction Materials) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was +2.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

PSGTY is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (+2.80% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PSGTY($3.01B) has a higher market cap than LKSGF($66.4M). PSGTY has higher P/E ratio than LKSGF: PSGTY (17.21) vs LKSGF (10.45). PSGTY YTD gains are higher at: -21.654 vs. LKSGF (-88.235). PSGTY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.34T vs. LKSGF (97.5M). PSGTY has more cash in the bank: 5.75T vs. LKSGF (456M). LKSGF has less debt than PSGTY: LKSGF (84.8M) vs PSGTY (16.38T). PSGTY has higher revenues than LKSGF: PSGTY (36.76T) vs LKSGF (502M).
LKSGFPSGTYLKSGF / PSGTY
Capitalization66.4M3.01B2%
EBITDA97.5M5.34T0%
Gain YTD-88.235-21.654407%
P/E Ratio10.4517.2161%
Revenue502M36.76T0%
Total Cash456M5.75T0%
Total Debt84.8M16.38T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LKSGF vs PSGTY: Fundamental Ratings
LKSGF
PSGTY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
1
Undervalued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8610
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9683
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1002
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LKSGF's Valuation (1) in the null industry is in the same range as PSGTY (8). This means that LKSGF’s stock grew similarly to PSGTY’s over the last 12 months.

LKSGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PSGTY (100). This means that LKSGF’s stock grew similarly to PSGTY’s over the last 12 months.

PSGTY's SMR Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LKSGF (86). This means that PSGTY’s stock grew significantly faster than LKSGF’s over the last 12 months.

PSGTY's Price Growth Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as LKSGF (96). This means that PSGTY’s stock grew similarly to LKSGF’s over the last 12 months.

PSGTY's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LKSGF (100). This means that PSGTY’s stock grew significantly faster than LKSGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LKSGFPSGTY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
36%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
37%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
38%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
31%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
16%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LKSGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PSGTY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PLLTL0.080.01
+15.61%
Piedmont Lithium Inc.
BKBLF0.05N/A
N/A
Magnetic North Acquisition Corp.
WYGPF8.70N/A
N/A
Worley Ltd.
PINXF0.70N/A
N/A
Peoples Insurance Company Group China
MRRDF0.59-0.01
-1.51%
Meridian Mining UK Societas

LKSGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LKSGF and SMID have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LKSGF and SMID's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LKSGF
1D Price
Change %
LKSGF100%
N/A
SMID - LKSGF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.25%
IBJHF - LKSGF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PSGTY - LKSGF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IMYSF - LKSGF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JHIUF - LKSGF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PSGTY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PSGTY and PPCLY have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PSGTY and PPCLY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PSGTY
1D Price
Change %
PSGTY100%
N/A
PPCLY - PSGTY
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TGAFF - PSGTY
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SMID - PSGTY
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.25%
IMYSF - PSGTY
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
THYCF - PSGTY
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More