Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LKSMX vs RRMGX
LKSMX vs RRMGX Comparison
Open Charts LKSMX vs RRMGX
LKCM Small-Mid Cap Equity Institutional
Price$12.01
Change+$0.32 (+2.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.71M
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth R
Price$90.84
Change+$1.69 (+1.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.61B
LKSMX vs RRMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LKSMX vs. RRMGX commentary
Aug 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LKSMX is a Buy and RRMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RRMGX has more cash in the bank: 27.6B vs. LKSMX (42.7M). LKSMX (0.00) and RRMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . LKSMX was incepted earlier than RRMGX: LKSMX (14 years) vs RRMGX (23 years). LKSMX (1.41) is less costly to investors than RRMGX (1.29). LKSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. RRMGX (22.60). LKSMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RRMGX: LKSMX (2000) vs RRMGX (2500). LKSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.70 vs. RRMGX (-4.81). LKSMX return over 5 years is better than : 20.70 vs. RRMGX (-2.21).
| LKSMX | RRMGX | LKSMX / RRMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.29 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.41 | 1.29 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.799 | 3.321 | 145% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.7M | 27.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.70 | -4.81 | -326% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.29 | 5.04 | 521% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.70 | -2.21 | -938% |
| Returns for 10 years | 1.26 | 25.92 | 5% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement