LLAZF vs LNKB
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LLAZF is a Hold and LNKB is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LLAZF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLNKB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- LLAZF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- LNKB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LNKB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- LNKB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
LLAZF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LNKB (@Regional Banks) price change was -3.60% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -3.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.80%.
Reported Earning Dates
LNKB is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (-3.34% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| LLAZF | LNKB | LLAZF / LNKB | |
| Capitalization | 2.13B | 258M | 826% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.170 | 1.407 | 83% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.36 | 125.83 | 10% |
| Revenue | 506M | 39.8M | 1,271% |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 2.22B | 88.5M | 2,505% |
| LNKB | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 57% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% |
LLAZF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LLAZF has been loosely correlated with HMLN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LLAZF jumps, then HMLN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LLAZF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LLAZF | 100% | N/A | ||
| HMLN - LLAZF | 40% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| OAKV - LLAZF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| LNKB - LLAZF | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.90% | ||
| CMBNF - LLAZF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GWBK - LLAZF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
LNKB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LNKB has been loosely correlated with SMBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LNKB jumps, then SMBC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LNKB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LNKB | 100% | -0.90% | ||
| SMBC - LNKB | 42% Loosely correlated | -2.38% | ||
| PRK - LNKB | 41% Loosely correlated | -2.14% | ||
| WABC - LNKB | 41% Loosely correlated | -2.25% | ||
| ISTR - LNKB | 41% Loosely correlated | -1.03% | ||
| INBK - LNKB | 41% Loosely correlated | -2.22% | ||
More | ||||