LLDTF
Price
$1.00
Change
-$0.18 (-15.25%)
Updated
Jul 28 closing price
Capitalization
37.17B
LRCDF
Price
$22.00
Change
-$0.27 (-1.21%)
Updated
Aug 1 closing price
Capitalization
1.3B
Interact to see
Advertisement

LLDTF vs LRCDF

Header iconLLDTF vs LRCDF Comparison
Open Charts LLDTF vs LRCDFBanner chart's image
Lloyds Banking Group
Price$1.00
Change-$0.18 (-15.25%)
Volume$100
Capitalization37.17B
Laurentian Bank of Canada
Price$22.00
Change-$0.27 (-1.21%)
Volume$300
Capitalization1.3B
LLDTF vs LRCDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LLDTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LRCDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LLDTF vs. LRCDF commentary
Aug 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LLDTF is a Hold and LRCDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 04, 2025
Stock price -- (LLDTF: $1.00 vs. LRCDF: $22.00)
Brand notoriety: LLDTF and LRCDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LLDTF: 0% vs. LRCDF: 29%
Market capitalization -- LLDTF: $37.17B vs. LRCDF: $1.3B
LLDTF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $37.17B. LRCDF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.3B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LLDTF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileLRCDF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LLDTF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • LRCDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, LLDTF is a better buy in the long-term than LRCDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LLDTF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LRCDF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LLDTF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LRCDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LLDTF is a better buy in the short-term than LRCDF.

Price Growth

LLDTF (@Regional Banks) experienced а -15.25% price change this week, while LRCDF (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-1.81% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LLDTF($37.2B) has a higher market cap than LRCDF($1.3B). LRCDF has higher P/E ratio than LLDTF: LRCDF (8.54) vs LLDTF (5.98). LLDTF YTD gains are higher at: 45.847 vs. LRCDF (10.165). LRCDF has less debt than LLDTF: LRCDF (15.4B) vs LLDTF (95.4B). LLDTF has higher revenues than LRCDF: LLDTF (19.6B) vs LRCDF (1.03B).
LLDTFLRCDFLLDTF / LRCDF
Capitalization37.2B1.3B2,855%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD45.84710.165451%
P/E Ratio5.988.5470%
Revenue19.6B1.03B1,896%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt95.4B15.4B619%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LLDTF vs LRCDF: Fundamental Ratings
LLDTF
LRCDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2197
SMR RATING
1..100
412
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4751
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2052
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LRCDF's Valuation (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LLDTF (55). This means that LRCDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LLDTF’s over the last 12 months.

LLDTF's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LRCDF (97). This means that LLDTF’s stock grew significantly faster than LRCDF’s over the last 12 months.

LLDTF's SMR Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as LRCDF (12). This means that LLDTF’s stock grew similarly to LRCDF’s over the last 12 months.

LLDTF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as LRCDF (51). This means that LLDTF’s stock grew similarly to LRCDF’s over the last 12 months.

LLDTF's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the null industry is in the same range as LRCDF (52). This means that LLDTF’s stock grew similarly to LRCDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LLDTFLRCDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 28 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LLDTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LRCDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LFLTX14.45-0.11
-0.76%
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value R5
SUVAX12.18-0.13
-1.06%
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Val A
RGERX21.14-0.25
-1.17%
Columbia Select Global Equity Inst2
APDRX34.31-0.48
-1.38%
Artisan Global Opportunities Advisor
PASTX54.55-1.28
-2.29%
T. Rowe Price Science & Tech Adv

LLDTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LLDTF and LYG have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LLDTF and LYG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LLDTF
1D Price
Change %
LLDTF100%
N/A
LYG - LLDTF
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.32%
KBCSF - LLDTF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OVCHY - LLDTF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.47%
LRCDF - LLDTF
11%
Poorly correlated
-1.21%
LFGP - LLDTF
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.10%
More

LRCDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LRCDF and SFBS have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LRCDF and SFBS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LRCDF
1D Price
Change %
LRCDF100%
-1.21%
SFBS - LRCDF
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.70%
CATY - LRCDF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.86%
BANR - LRCDF
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.60%
KBCSY - LRCDF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.19%
FFBC - LRCDF
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.48%
More