Advertisement
LLDTF vs LYG
To understand the difference between Lloyds Banking Group plc (LLDTF) vs. Lloyds Banking Group plc - ADR (LYG) it is enough to know the definitions of ADR
ADR - American depositary receipt (ADR) is a certificate issued by a U.S. depositary bank representing a specified number of shares (often 1 share) of a foreign company's stock. ADRs are denominated in U.S. dollars and trade on U.S. stock markets and OTC depending on the ADRs classification.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LLDTF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLYG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- LLDTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- LYG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LLDTF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LYG’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LLDTF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
- LYG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
LLDTF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +6.13% price change this week, while LYG (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.76% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.81%.
Reported Earning Dates
LYG is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (+0.26% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| LLDTF | LYG | LLDTF / LYG | |
| Capitalization | 66.3B | 66.3B | 100% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 64.078 | 71.812 | 89% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.65 | 12.56 | 101% |
| Revenue | 19.1B | 19.1B | 100% |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 85.4B | 85.4B | 100% |
LLDTF | LYG | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 33 | 81 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 76 Overvalued | 76 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 16 | 7 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 2 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LLDTF's Valuation (76) in the null industry is in the same range as LYG (76) in the Major Banks industry. This means that LLDTF’s stock grew similarly to LYG’s over the last 12 months.
LYG's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as LLDTF (16) in the null industry. This means that LYG’s stock grew similarly to LLDTF’s over the last 12 months.
LYG's SMR Rating (100) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as LLDTF (100) in the null industry. This means that LYG’s stock grew similarly to LLDTF’s over the last 12 months.
LLDTF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as LYG (43) in the Major Banks industry. This means that LLDTF’s stock grew similarly to LYG’s over the last 12 months.
LLDTF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as LYG (100) in the Major Banks industry. This means that LLDTF’s stock grew similarly to LYG’s over the last 12 months.
| LLDTF | LYG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 59% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 61% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 16 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 65% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 61% |
Advertisement
LLDTF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LLDTF and LYG have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LLDTF and LYG's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LLDTF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LLDTF | 100% | N/A | ||
| LYG - LLDTF | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.45% | ||
| KBCSF - LLDTF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| OVCHY - LLDTF | 21% Poorly correlated | +2.59% | ||
| LRCDF - LLDTF | 11% Poorly correlated | -0.17% | ||
| LFGP - LLDTF | 6% Poorly correlated | -0.22% | ||
More | ||||
LYG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LYG has been closely correlated with NWG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LYG jumps, then NWG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LYG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LYG | 100% | -0.45% | ||
| NWG - LYG | 71% Closely correlated | -1.48% | ||
| BSAC - LYG | 54% Loosely correlated | +1.10% | ||
| SBNY - LYG | 53% Loosely correlated | +14.58% | ||
| DB - LYG | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.88% | ||
| SCGLY - LYG | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.82% | ||
More | ||||