Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LLGLX vs TEDSX
LLGLX vs TEDSX Comparison
Open Charts LLGLX vs TEDSX
Longleaf Partners Global
Price$14.91
Change+$0.20 (+1.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets265.07M
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
Price$32.66
Change+$0.03 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.39B
LLGLX vs TEDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LLGLX vs. TEDSX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LLGLX is a StrongBuy and TEDSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX has more cash in the bank: 9.39B vs. LLGLX (265M). LLGLX pays higher dividends than TEDSX: LLGLX (2.80) vs TEDSX (0.86). LLGLX was incepted earlier than TEDSX: LLGLX (13 years) vs TEDSX (33 years). TEDSX (1.96) is less costly to investors than LLGLX (1.29). LLGLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. TEDSX (34.55). TEDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than LLGLX: TEDSX (1000) vs LLGLX (10000). LLGLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.50 vs. TEDSX (3.12). TEDSX return over 5 years is better than : 34.47 vs. LLGLX (31.09).
| LLGLX | TEDSX | LLGLX / TEDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.96 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.96 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.297 | 16.352 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 1000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 265M | 9.39B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.80 | 0.86 | 325% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.50 | 3.12 | 433% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.66 | 20.55 | 247% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.09 | 34.47 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.86 | 9.73 | 656% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers