Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LLGLX vs TEDSX
LLGLX vs TEDSX Comparison
Open Charts LLGLX vs TEDSX
Longleaf Partners Global
Price$14.29
Change-$0.01 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets251.17M
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
Price$31.83
Change-$0.10 (-0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.17B
LLGLX vs TEDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LLGLX vs. TEDSX commentary
Nov 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LLGLX is a Hold and TEDSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX has more cash in the bank: 9.17B vs. LLGLX (251M). LLGLX pays higher dividends than TEDSX: LLGLX (2.88) vs TEDSX (0.75). LLGLX was incepted earlier than TEDSX: LLGLX (13 years) vs TEDSX (33 years). TEDSX (1.96) is less costly to investors than LLGLX (1.29). LLGLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. TEDSX (34.55). TEDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than LLGLX: TEDSX (1000) vs LLGLX (10000). LLGLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.25 vs. TEDSX (1.75). TEDSX return over 5 years is better than : 22.33 vs. LLGLX (14.41).
| LLGLX | TEDSX | LLGLX / TEDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.96 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.96 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.745 | 13.751 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 1000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 251M | 9.17B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.88 | 0.75 | 382% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.25 | 1.75 | 244% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.61 | 14.52 | 321% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.41 | 22.33 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.21 | 5.23 | 998% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers