Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LLGLX vs TEDSX
LLGLX vs TEDSX Comparison
Open Charts LLGLX vs TEDSX
Longleaf Partners Global
Price$14.34
Change+$0.21 (+1.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets249.11M
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
Price$32.17
Change+$0.24 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.26B
LLGLX vs TEDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LLGLX vs. TEDSX commentary
Oct 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LLGLX is a Buy and TEDSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX has more cash in the bank: 9.26B vs. LLGLX (249M). LLGLX pays higher dividends than TEDSX: LLGLX (2.85) vs TEDSX (0.85). LLGLX was incepted earlier than TEDSX: LLGLX (13 years) vs TEDSX (33 years). TEDSX (1.96) is less costly to investors than LLGLX (1.29). LLGLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. TEDSX (34.55). TEDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than LLGLX: TEDSX (1000) vs LLGLX (10000). TEDSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.23 vs. LLGLX (-0.02). TEDSX return over 5 years is better than : 33.11 vs. LLGLX (25.33).
| LLGLX | TEDSX | LLGLX / TEDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.96 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.96 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.452 | 13.751 | 54% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 1000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 249M | 9.26B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.85 | 0.85 | 335% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.02 | 0.23 | -11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.54 | 29.13 | 201% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.33 | 33.11 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.92 | 6.24 | 751% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement