LLLAF
Price
$0.09
Change
+$0.05 (+125.00%)
Updated
Jun 9 closing price
Capitalization
909.73M
USREF
Price
$0.50
Change
+$0.06 (+13.64%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
5.38M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LLLAF vs USREF

Header iconLLLAF vs USREF Comparison
Open Charts LLLAF vs USREFBanner chart's image
LEO LITHIUM
Price$0.09
Change+$0.05 (+125.00%)
Volume$1.2K
Capitalization909.73M
TACTICAL RES
Price$0.50
Change+$0.06 (+13.64%)
Volume$3.4K
Capitalization5.38M
LLLAF vs USREF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LLLAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
USREF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LLLAF vs. USREF commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LLLAF is a Hold and USREF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (LLLAF: $0.09 vs. USREF: $0.50)
Brand notoriety: LLLAF and USREF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LLLAF: 14% vs. USREF: 96%
Market capitalization -- LLLAF: $909.73M vs. USREF: $5.38M
LLLAF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $909.73M. USREF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $5.38M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LLLAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUSREF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LLLAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • USREF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LLLAF is a better buy in the long-term than USREF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LLLAF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while USREF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LLLAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • USREF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LLLAF is a better buy in the short-term than USREF.

Price Growth

LLLAF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while USREF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +29.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.02%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.12% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LLLAF($910M) has a higher market cap than USREF($5.38M). USREF YTD gains are higher at: 1900.000 vs. LLLAF (-19.048).
LLLAFUSREFLLLAF / USREF
Capitalization910M5.38M16,902%
EBITDAN/A-3.09M-
Gain YTD-19.0481900.000-1%
P/E Ratio7.79N/A-
RevenueN/A0-
Total CashN/A1.12M-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LLLAFUSREF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LLLAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
USREF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VNVYX24.72N/A
N/A
Natixis Vaughan Nelson Mid Cap Y
BMRRX36.64N/A
N/A
BlackRock Mid-Cap Growth Equity R
FSCTX24.30N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap M
MXEBX16.36N/A
N/A
Empower Core Strategies US Eq Instl
FMSGX16.78N/A
N/A
Frontier MFG Global Sustainable Instl

LLLAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LLLAF has been loosely correlated with AUSDF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LLLAF jumps, then AUSDF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LLLAF
1D Price
Change %
LLLAF100%
N/A
AUSDF - LLLAF
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
WHYRF - LLLAF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GGIFF - LLLAF
24%
Poorly correlated
-21.15%
PGXFF - LLLAF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRRLF - LLLAF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

USREF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that USREF and LBNKF have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that USREF and LBNKF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To USREF
1D Price
Change %
USREF100%
+13.22%
LBNKF - USREF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LLLAF - USREF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GEODF - USREF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.75%
IONR - USREF
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.10%
GTMLF - USREF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More