Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMBAX vs NAESX
LMBAX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts LMBAX vs NAESX
LMBAX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMBAX vs. NAESX commentary
Jul 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMBAX is a Buy and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 189B vs. LMBAX (150M). NAESX pays higher dividends than LMBAX: NAESX (1.07) vs LMBAX (0.01). LMBAX was incepted earlier than NAESX: LMBAX (17 years) vs NAESX (66 years). LMBAX (1.36) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). LMBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMBAX: NAESX (0) vs LMBAX (1000). LMBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.74 vs. NAESX (21.74). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 36.99 vs. LMBAX (14.52).
| LMBAX | NAESX | LMBAX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.17 | 765% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.17 | 800% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 66 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.921 | 15.333 | 123% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 150M | 189B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.01 | 1.07 | 1% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.74 | 21.74 | 137% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.61 | 45.95 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.52 | 36.99 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.99 | 154.56 | 29% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers