Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMBAX vs NAESX
LMBAX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts LMBAX vs NAESX
LMBAX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMBAX vs. NAESX commentary
Jun 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMBAX is a StrongBuy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 183B vs. LMBAX (142M). NAESX pays higher dividends than LMBAX: NAESX (1.08) vs LMBAX (0.01). LMBAX was incepted earlier than NAESX: LMBAX (17 years) vs NAESX (66 years). LMBAX (1.36) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). LMBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMBAX: NAESX (0) vs LMBAX (1000). LMBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.82 vs. NAESX (26.54). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 31.25 vs. LMBAX (4.01).
| LMBAX | NAESX | LMBAX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.17 | 765% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.17 | 800% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 66 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.989 | 14.230 | 112% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 142M | 183B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.01 | 1.08 | 1% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.82 | 26.54 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.44 | 50.45 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.01 | 31.25 | 13% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.10 | 166.53 | 29% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers