Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMBCX vs NAESX
LMBCX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts LMBCX vs NAESX
Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity C
Price$11.29
Change+$0.16 (+1.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets101.1M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$111.61
Change+$1.26 (+1.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets147.56B
LMBCX vs NAESX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMBCX vs. NAESX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMBCX is a Buy and NAESX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. LMBCX (101M). NAESX pays higher dividends than LMBCX: NAESX (1.35) vs LMBCX (0.48). LMBCX was incepted earlier than NAESX: LMBCX (16 years) vs NAESX (65 years). LMBCX (2.13) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). LMBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). LMBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: LMBCX (1000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.13 vs. LMBCX (0.12). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 52.20 vs. LMBCX (14.47).
| LMBCX | NAESX | LMBCX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 0.17 | 1,206% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.13 | 0.17 | 1,253% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.025 | -4.086 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 101M | 148B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 1.35 | 35% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.12 | 5.13 | 2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.14 | 16.63 | 13% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.47 | 52.20 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | -17.09 | 96.08 | -18% |