Ad is loading...
LMBCX vs NAESX
LMBCX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts LMBCX vs NAESX
Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity C
Price$11.42
Change+$0.06 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$116.25
Change+$1.25 (+1.09%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
LMBCX vs NAESX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMBCX vs. NAESX commentary
Dec 22, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMBCX is a Hold and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 167B vs. LMBCX (104M). NAESX pays higher dividends than LMBCX: NAESX (1.31) vs LMBCX (0.00). LMBCX was incepted earlier than NAESX: LMBCX (16 years) vs NAESX (64 years). LMBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. NAESX (12.00). LMBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: LMBCX (1000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.50 vs. LMBCX (5.96). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 47.90 vs. LMBCX (2.46).
| LMBCX | NAESX | LMBCX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 64 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.666 | 14.022 | 40% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 104M | 167B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.31 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.96 | 14.50 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | -22.41 | 10.57 | -212% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.46 | 47.90 | 5% |
| Returns for 10 years | -10.63 | 115.27 | -9% |