Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMCFX vs VEVYX
LMCFX vs VEVYX Comparison
Open Charts LMCFX vs VEVYX
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock F
Price$33.88
Change-$0.18 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.14B
Victory Sycamore Established Value Y
Price$46.64
Change-$0.33 (-0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.09B
LMCFX vs VEVYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMCFX vs. VEVYX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMCFX is a Hold and VEVYX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VEVYX has more cash in the bank: 17.1B vs. LMCFX (1.14B). VEVYX pays higher dividends than LMCFX: VEVYX (1.02) vs LMCFX (0.68). LMCFX was incepted earlier than VEVYX: LMCFX (18 years) vs VEVYX (13 years). LMCFX (0.88) is less costly to investors than VEVYX (0.66). LMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. VEVYX (34.00). LMCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than VEVYX: LMCFX (0) vs VEVYX (1000000). LMCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.17 vs. VEVYX (-8.40). LMCFX return over 5 years is better than : 39.75 vs. VEVYX (34.59).
| LMCFX | VEVYX | LMCFX / VEVYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.66 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.66 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.037 | 3.010 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.14B | 17.1B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 1.02 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.17 | -8.40 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.84 | 12.37 | 217% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.75 | 34.59 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.10 | 52.15 | 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement