Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMCFX vs VEVYX
LMCFX vs VEVYX Comparison
Open Charts LMCFX vs VEVYX
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock F
Price$33.15
Change-$0.14 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.09B
Victory Sycamore Established Value Y
Price$44.91
Change-$0.17 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.82B
LMCFX vs VEVYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMCFX vs. VEVYX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMCFX is a Hold and VEVYX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VEVYX has more cash in the bank: 15.8B vs. LMCFX (1.09B). VEVYX pays higher dividends than LMCFX: VEVYX (1.05) vs LMCFX (0.68). LMCFX was incepted earlier than VEVYX: LMCFX (18 years) vs VEVYX (13 years). LMCFX (0.87) is less costly to investors than VEVYX (0.66). LMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. VEVYX (34.00). LMCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than VEVYX: LMCFX (0) vs VEVYX (1000000). LMCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -11.37 vs. VEVYX (-12.99). LMCFX return over 5 years is better than : 25.49 vs. VEVYX (19.42).
| LMCFX | VEVYX | LMCFX / VEVYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.66 | 132% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.66 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.270 | -1.135 | 24% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.09B | 15.8B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 1.05 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.37 | -12.99 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.79 | -2.70 | -474% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.49 | 19.42 | 131% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.92 | 42.90 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement