Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMCFX vs VEVYX
LMCFX vs VEVYX Comparison
Open Charts LMCFX vs VEVYX
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock F
Price$32.33
Change+$0.16 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.1B
Victory Sycamore Established Value Y
Price$45.70
Change-$0.01 (-0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.12B
LMCFX vs VEVYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMCFX vs. VEVYX commentary
Aug 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMCFX is a Buy and VEVYX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VEVYX has more cash in the bank: 17.1B vs. LMCFX (1.1B). VEVYX pays higher dividends than LMCFX: VEVYX (1.08) vs LMCFX (0.70). LMCFX was incepted earlier than VEVYX: LMCFX (18 years) vs VEVYX (13 years). LMCFX (0.88) is less costly to investors than VEVYX (0.66). LMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. VEVYX (34.00). LMCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than VEVYX: LMCFX (0) vs VEVYX (1000000). LMCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.35 vs. VEVYX (-6.25). VEVYX (35.45) and LMCFX (35.00) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LMCFX | VEVYX | LMCFX / VEVYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.66 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.66 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.146 | 0.038 | -8,239% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.1B | 17.1B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 1.08 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.35 | -6.25 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.57 | 0.71 | 1,632% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.00 | 35.45 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.89 | 44.87 | 67% |