Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMCQX vs VEVYX
LMCQX vs VEVYX Comparison
Open Charts LMCQX vs VEVYX
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock R2
Price$32.12
Change-$0.29 (-0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.09B
Victory Sycamore Established Value Y
Price$44.86
Change-$0.44 (-0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.3B
LMCQX vs VEVYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMCQX vs. VEVYX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMCQX is a Buy and VEVYX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VEVYX has more cash in the bank: 17.3B vs. LMCQX (1.09B). VEVYX pays higher dividends than LMCQX: VEVYX (1.12) vs LMCQX (0.25). LMCQX was incepted earlier than VEVYX: LMCQX (17 years) vs VEVYX (12 years). LMCQX (1.38) is less costly to investors than VEVYX (0.66). LMCQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. VEVYX (34.00). LMCQX has a lower initial minimum investment than VEVYX: LMCQX (0) vs VEVYX (1000000). LMCQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.34 vs. VEVYX (-5.42). VEVYX return over 5 years is better than : 48.01 vs. LMCQX (45.35).
| LMCQX | VEVYX | LMCQX / VEVYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.38 | 0.66 | 209% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.38 | 0.66 | 209% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.936 | -0.837 | 231% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.09B | 17.3B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.25 | 1.12 | 22% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.34 | -5.42 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.13 | 5.12 | 295% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.35 | 48.01 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.65 | 44.58 | 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement