Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMGCX vs PMBMX
LMGCX vs PMBMX Comparison
Open Charts LMGCX vs PMBMX
Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities C
Price$17.30
Change-$0.19 (-1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets711.56M
LMGCX vs PMBMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMGCX vs. PMBMX commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMGCX is a Buy and PMBMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBMX has more cash in the bank: 33.2B vs. LMGCX (712M). PMBMX pays higher dividends than LMGCX: PMBMX (0.02) vs LMGCX (0.00). LMGCX was incepted earlier than PMBMX: LMGCX (27 years) vs PMBMX (25 years). LMGCX (1.90) is less costly to investors than PMBMX (1.14). LMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 117.00 vs. PMBMX (10.50). PMBMX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMGCX: PMBMX (0) vs LMGCX (1000). LMGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.97 vs. PMBMX (3.33). PMBMX return over 5 years is better than : 41.93 vs. LMGCX (-13.20).
| LMGCX | PMBMX | LMGCX / PMBMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 1.14 | 150% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 1.14 | 167% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.474 | 5.459 | 375% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 712M | 33.2B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.97 | 3.33 | 989% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.75 | 46.46 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.20 | 41.93 | -31% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.25 | 104.22 | 2% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement