Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMGCX vs PMBPX
LMGCX vs PMBPX Comparison
Open Charts LMGCX vs PMBPX
Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities C
Price$14.96
Change-$0.08 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets603.67M
LMGCX vs PMBPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMGCX vs. PMBPX commentary
Jun 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMGCX is a Buy and PMBPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBPX has more cash in the bank: 30.8B vs. LMGCX (604M). PMBPX pays higher dividends than LMGCX: PMBPX (0.01) vs LMGCX (0.00). LMGCX was incepted earlier than PMBPX: LMGCX (27 years) vs PMBPX (25 years). LMGCX (1.90) is less costly to investors than PMBPX (0.83). LMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 117.00 vs. PMBPX (10.50). PMBPX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMGCX: PMBPX (0) vs LMGCX (1000). LMGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.10 vs. PMBPX (10.28). PMBPX return over 5 years is better than : 51.01 vs. LMGCX (-15.88).
| LMGCX | PMBPX | LMGCX / PMBPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.83 | 206% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.83 | 229% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.735 | 2.531 | 187% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 604M | 30.8B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.01 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.10 | 10.28 | 205% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.61 | 53.09 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.88 | 51.01 | -31% |
| Returns for 10 years | -19.10 | 92.15 | -21% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement