Ad is loading...
LMGCX vs PMBPX
LMGCX vs PMBPX Comparison
Open Charts LMGCX vs PMBPX
Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities C
Price$12.77
Change+$0.29 (+2.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets495.88M
LMGCX vs PMBPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMGCX vs. PMBPX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMGCX is a Hold and PMBPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBPX has more cash in the bank: 29.5B vs. LMGCX (496M). PMBPX pays higher dividends than LMGCX: PMBPX (0.01) vs LMGCX (0.00). LMGCX was incepted earlier than PMBPX: LMGCX (26 years) vs PMBPX (24 years). LMGCX (1.91) is less costly to investors than PMBPX (0.84). LMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 117.00 vs. PMBPX (10.50). PMBPX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMGCX: PMBPX (0) vs LMGCX (1000). PMBPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.97 vs. LMGCX (-0.24). PMBPX return over 5 years is better than : 101.36 vs. LMGCX (-3.70).
| LMGCX | PMBPX | LMGCX / PMBPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.84 | 204% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.84 | 227% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -13.092 | 0.115 | -11,380% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 496M | 29.5B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.01 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.24 | 6.97 | -3% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.03 | 19.54 | -16% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.70 | 101.36 | -4% |
| Returns for 10 years | -30.59 | 88.35 | -35% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers