Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMGCX vs PMBPX
LMGCX vs PMBPX Comparison
Open Charts LMGCX vs PMBPX
Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities C
Price$15.42
Change-$0.20 (-1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets629.92M
LMGCX vs PMBPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMGCX vs. PMBPX commentary
Jul 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMGCX is a Buy and PMBPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBPX has more cash in the bank: 32.1B vs. LMGCX (630M). PMBPX pays higher dividends than LMGCX: PMBPX (0.01) vs LMGCX (0.00). LMGCX was incepted earlier than PMBPX: LMGCX (27 years) vs PMBPX (25 years). LMGCX (1.90) is less costly to investors than PMBPX (0.83). LMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 117.00 vs. PMBPX (10.50). PMBPX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMGCX: PMBPX (0) vs LMGCX (1000). LMGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.17 vs. PMBPX (14.71). PMBPX return over 5 years is better than : 58.38 vs. LMGCX (-15.80).
| LMGCX | PMBPX | LMGCX / PMBPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.83 | 206% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.83 | 229% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.774 | 6.259 | 140% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 630M | 32.1B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.01 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.17 | 14.71 | 164% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.90 | 49.70 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.80 | 58.38 | -27% |
| Returns for 10 years | -14.64 | 102.17 | -14% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement