Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMGCX vs VMGMX
LMGCX vs VMGMX Comparison
Open Charts LMGCX vs VMGMX
Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities C
Price$14.96
Change-$0.08 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets603.67M
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Admiral
Price$116.70
Change-$0.92 (-0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.66B
LMGCX vs VMGMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMGCX vs. VMGMX commentary
Jun 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMGCX is a Buy and VMGMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VMGMX has more cash in the bank: 29.7B vs. LMGCX (604M). VMGMX pays higher dividends than LMGCX: VMGMX (0.65) vs LMGCX (0.00). LMGCX was incepted earlier than VMGMX: LMGCX (27 years) vs VMGMX (14 years). LMGCX (1.90) is less costly to investors than VMGMX (0.07). LMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 117.00 vs. VMGMX (21.00). LMGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VMGMX: LMGCX (1000) vs VMGMX (3000). LMGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.10 vs. VMGMX (18.49). VMGMX return over 5 years is better than : 65.85 vs. LMGCX (-15.88).
| LMGCX | VMGMX | LMGCX / VMGMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.07 | 2,443% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.07 | 2,714% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.735 | 7.672 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 604M | 29.7B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.65 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.10 | 18.49 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.61 | 61.20 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.88 | 65.85 | -24% |
| Returns for 10 years | -19.10 | 153.58 | -12% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement