Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMGCX vs VMGMX
LMGCX vs VMGMX Comparison
Open Charts LMGCX vs VMGMX
Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities C
Price$16.04
Change-$0.12 (-0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets652.43M
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Admiral
Price$125.59
Change+$2.59 (+2.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets31.45B
LMGCX vs VMGMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMGCX vs. VMGMX commentary
Aug 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMGCX is a Buy and VMGMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VMGMX has more cash in the bank: 31.5B vs. LMGCX (652M). VMGMX pays higher dividends than LMGCX: VMGMX (0.61) vs LMGCX (0.00). LMGCX was incepted earlier than VMGMX: LMGCX (27 years) vs VMGMX (14 years). LMGCX (1.90) is less costly to investors than VMGMX (0.07). LMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 117.00 vs. VMGMX (21.00). LMGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VMGMX: LMGCX (1000) vs VMGMX (3000). LMGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.02 vs. VMGMX (28.35). VMGMX return over 5 years is better than : 58.92 vs. LMGCX (-19.78).
| LMGCX | VMGMX | LMGCX / VMGMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.07 | 2,443% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.07 | 2,714% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.889 | 12.628 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 652M | 31.5B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.61 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 40.02 | 28.35 | 141% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.53 | 42.86 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | -19.78 | 58.92 | -34% |
| Returns for 10 years | -13.91 | 172.32 | -8% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers