LMGDF
Price
$0.91
Change
-$0.01 (-1.09%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
125.92M
SA
Price
$15.85
Change
+$0.09 (+0.57%)
Updated
Jul 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.31B
32 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LMGDF vs SA

Header iconLMGDF vs SA Comparison
Open Charts LMGDF vs SABanner chart's image
Lumina Gold
Price$0.91
Change-$0.01 (-1.09%)
Volume$9.75K
Capitalization125.92M
Seabridge Gold
Price$15.85
Change+$0.09 (+0.57%)
Volume$3K
Capitalization1.31B
LMGDF vs SA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LMGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LMGDF vs. SA commentary
Jul 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMGDF is a Hold and SA is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 17, 2025
Stock price -- (LMGDF: $0.91 vs. SA: $15.76)
Brand notoriety: LMGDF and SA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LMGDF: 95% vs. SA: 75%
Market capitalization -- LMGDF: $125.92M vs. SA: $1.31B
LMGDF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $125.92M. SA’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $1.31B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LMGDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LMGDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both LMGDF and SA are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LMGDF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SA’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LMGDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SA is a better buy in the short-term than LMGDF.

Price Growth

LMGDF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SA (@Precious Metals) price change was +3.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +1.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +53.91%.

Reported Earning Dates

LMGDF is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2025.

SA is expected to report earnings on Aug 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+1.89% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SA($1.31B) has a higher market cap than LMGDF($126M). LMGDF YTD gains are higher at: 179.816 vs. SA (38.124). LMGDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -21.38M vs. SA (-33.83M). SA has more cash in the bank: 86.2M vs. LMGDF (954K). LMGDF has less debt than SA: LMGDF (10.1M) vs SA (575M). LMGDF (0) and SA (0) have equivalent revenues.
LMGDFSALMGDF / SA
Capitalization126M1.31B10%
EBITDA-21.38M-33.83M63%
Gain YTD179.81638.124472%
P/E RatioN/A158.73-
Revenue00-
Total Cash954K86.2M1%
Total Debt10.1M575M2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LMGDF vs SA: Fundamental Ratings
LMGDF
SA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2619
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6293
SMR RATING
1..100
10090
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3644
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10062
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LMGDF's Valuation (83) in the null industry is in the same range as SA (94) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that LMGDF’s stock grew similarly to SA’s over the last 12 months.

LMGDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as SA (93) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that LMGDF’s stock grew similarly to SA’s over the last 12 months.

SA's SMR Rating (90) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as LMGDF (100) in the null industry. This means that SA’s stock grew similarly to LMGDF’s over the last 12 months.

LMGDF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as SA (44) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that LMGDF’s stock grew similarly to SA’s over the last 12 months.

SA's P/E Growth Rating (62) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LMGDF (100) in the null industry. This means that SA’s stock grew somewhat faster than LMGDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LMGDFSA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LMGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSLA321.6710.89
+3.50%
Tesla
GME23.680.46
+1.98%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X118738.510000961.312500
+0.82%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
AAPL210.161.05
+0.50%
Apple
SPY624.222.08
+0.33%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF

LMGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LMGDF has been loosely correlated with MAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LMGDF jumps, then MAG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LMGDF
1D Price
Change %
LMGDF100%
N/A
MAG - LMGDF
43%
Loosely correlated
-2.19%
MTA - LMGDF
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.75%
AUGG - LMGDF
40%
Loosely correlated
+25.37%
SAND - LMGDF
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.10%
SA - LMGDF
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.06%
More